June 30, 2009 at 6:41 am
espilman (6/30/2009)
All I was saying is that I wasn't sure whether the integrity of the columns needed to be intact.
That's exactly the reason why I want to know what the business reason behind this is. It does, in fact, destroy columnar integrity.... well, on a normal table it would. I'm not so sure that this is a properly formed table unless someone is trying to do something like sort lottery numbers just to make it easier to see if you're ticket won. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 30, 2009 at 10:39 am
Jeff Moden (6/30/2009)
espilman (6/30/2009)
All I was saying is that I wasn't sure whether the integrity of the columns needed to be intact.That's exactly the reason why I want to know what the business reason behind this is. It does, in fact, destroy columnar integrity.... well, on a normal table it would. I'm not so sure that this is a properly formed table unless someone is trying to do something like sort lottery numbers just to make it easier to see if you're ticket won. 🙂
That's the reaction I had (i.e. normalization problem). I somehow doubt you will get your answer, but you're probably not too far off in your guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?
June 30, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Matt Miller (6/30/2009)
Jeff Moden (6/30/2009)
espilman (6/30/2009)
All I was saying is that I wasn't sure whether the integrity of the columns needed to be intact.That's exactly the reason why I want to know what the business reason behind this is. It does, in fact, destroy columnar integrity.... well, on a normal table it would. I'm not so sure that this is a properly formed table unless someone is trying to do something like sort lottery numbers just to make it easier to see if you're ticket won. 🙂
That's the reaction I had (i.e. normalization problem). I somehow doubt you will get your answer, but you're probably not too far off in your guess.
You know, you'd think I'd learn... never give an answer until they tell you what you want to know because they just take the answer and run, never to be seen again... until they have another problem where they won't answer a simple question. If I black-listed everyone that has done that to (just) me, a lot of folks on SSC would never get another answer. 😉
Heh... apparently forums and plumbing have a lot in common because right now, the word "check-valve" comes to mind. :hehe:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply