Help filtering my WHERE clause

  • Hi, I work in a hospital and look after a db containing the surgical procedures performed on our patients. I am trying to write a query that will count the number of specific combinations of procedures performed by our two surgeons but I'm struggling to extract just the right patient records.

    I have attached a script that will produce a simplified cutdown version of the db but will hopefully demonstrate my problem. Each record has a PatID, Date, Doctor and upto four possible operation procedures (op1 to op4) that a patient may receive. There are 6 possible options for surgical procedure (a to f). I need to count the number of times each surgeon has done a procedure where op1 to op4 includes procedure b AND d OR just d irrespective of any other recorded procedures for that patient. I also need the same thing for procedures b AND e but I'm sure I can figure that from any help you give me with the former. I think my inexperience with resolving the boolean string is my problem? I don't seem to able to get to the right syntax on all four of the 'op' fields together.

    The output should be no more than; Doc, CountOfCases

    Thank you in advance for any help you can provide me.

    Ian

    NB: I'm not sure if my .sql file uploaded so I've added the text below:

    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Operation] (

    [PatID] [nchar](10) NOT NULL,

    [OpDate] [datetime] NULL,

    [Doc] [char](20) NULL,

    [Op1] [char](20) NULL,

    [Op2] [char](20) NULL,

    [Op3] [char](20) NULL,

    [Op4] [char](20) NULL

    )

    GO

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('1', '20210101', 'MrX', 'a', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('2', '20210101', 'MrY', 'c', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('3', '20210101', 'MrX', 'a', 'b', 'd', 'c');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('4', '20210103', 'MrX', 'b', 'e', 'f', 'a');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('5', '20210103', 'MrX', 'c', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('6', '20210104', 'MrY', 'd', 'f', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('7', '20210105', 'MrX', 'b', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('8', '20210105', 'MrY', 'd', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('9', '20210105', 'MrY', 'e', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('10', '20210108', 'MrX', 'a', 'd', 'b', 'f');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('11', '20210108', 'MrX', 'e', 'f', 'c', 'a');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('12', '20210112', 'MrY', 'b', 'a', 'd', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('13', '20210114', 'MrX', 'd', 'b', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('14', '20210114', 'MrX', 'e', 'b', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('15', '20210114', 'MrY', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('16', '20210114', 'MrY', 'b', 'd', 'f', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('17', '20210115', 'MrX', 'b', 'd', 'f', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('18', '20210115', 'MrX', 'c', '', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('19', '20210118', 'MrY', 'e', 'c', '', '');

    INSERT INTO dbo.Operation VALUES ('20', '20210119', 'MrY', 'b', 'f', '', '');

    • This topic was modified 3 years, 9 months ago by  eyejay. Reason: Unsure .sql file uploaded successfully
  • I have 2 options assuming im understanding correctly what ur trying to achieve:

    --##################################################################################
    --UNPIVOT: Convert Columns to Rows
    --##################################################################################
    select Doc,Name_OF,Number_OF
    from [dbo].[Operation
    UNPIVOT
    (Number_OF for Name_OF in (Op1,Op2,Op3,Op4)) up

    --Filtered only rows where in the column/row theres no empty string
    --Count/Group by cant be applied for multiple options this way
    select DOC,count(*)
    from (
    select Doc,Name_OF,Number_OF
    from [dbo].[Operation
    UNPIVOT
    (Number_OF for Name_OF in (Op1,Op2,Op3,Op4)) up
    ) kek
    where Number_OF != ''
    group by Doc


    --##################################################################################
    --Case when
    --##################################################################################
    --Count OPx if its not an empty string
    select doc, sum(Count_OP1+Count_OP2+Count_OP3+Count_OP4)
    from (
    select *
    ,Count_OP1 = case when Op1 != ''
    THEN 1
    else 0 END
    ,Count_OP2 = case when Op2 != ''
    THEN 1
    else 0 END
    ,Count_OP3 = case when Op3 != ''
    THEN 1
    else 0 END
    ,Count_OP4 = case when Op4 != ''
    THEN 1
    else 0 END
    from [dbo].[Operation
    ) kek
    group by doc
  • eyejay wrote:

    Each record has a PatID, Date, Doctor and upto four possible operation procedures (op1 to op4) that a patient may receive. There are 6 possible options for surgical procedure (a to f). I need to count the number of times each surgeon has done a procedure where op1 to op4 includes procedure b AND d OR just d irrespective of any other recorded procedures for that patient.

    'b AND d' is a subset of 'just d irrespective ...' so they're not mutually exclusive groups.  In this case it seems the direct way to count would be using ktflash's method #2 using CASE WHEN's imo.

    select o.Doc, count(*) all_cases, sum(v.b) both
    from dbo.Operation o
    cross apply (values ((case when o.Op1='d' then 1
    when o.Op2='d' then 1
    when o.Op3='d' then 1
    when o.Op4='d' then 1 else 0 end),
    (case when o.Op1='b' then 1
    when o.Op2='b' then 1
    when o.Op3='b' then 1
    when o.Op4='b' then 1 else 0 end))) v(d, b)
    where v.d=1
    /*or (v.d+v.b)=2 ** adding this makes no difference to total rows ** */
    group by o.Doc;
    Docall_casesboth
    MrX 44
    MrY 53

    Aus dem Paradies, das Cantor uns geschaffen, soll uns niemand vertreiben können

  •  

    SELECT
    Doc,
    SUM(CASE WHEN CHARINDEX('d', Op1+Op2+Op3+Op4) > 0
    THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS total_d,
    SUM(CASE WHEN CHARINDEX('b', Op1+Op2+Op3+Op4) > 0 AND CHARINDEX('d', Op1+Op2+Op3+Op4) > 0
    THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS total_b_and_d
    FROM dbo.Operation
    GROUP BY Doc

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear." "Norm", on "Cheers". Also from "Cheers", from "Carla": "You need to know 3 things about Tortelli men: Tortelli men draw women like flies; Tortelli men treat women like flies; Tortelli men's brains are in their flies".

  • eyejay wrote:

    I need to count the number of times each surgeon has done a procedure where op1 to op4 includes procedure b AND d OR just d irrespective of any other recorded procedures for that patient.

    You know that: (b AND d OR d) = d?

    It would be easier to answer if you supplied the output you expect.

     

  • Hi ktflash and Steve,

    Thank you both very much for showing me the error in my boolean logic, obvious really 🙂 and then how to get the results I needed. I've not come across 'cross apply' before, so thank you again.

    Ian

  • You really don't need UNPIVOT or CROSS APPLY for this.  They do add some overhead.

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear." "Norm", on "Cheers". Also from "Cheers", from "Carla": "You need to know 3 things about Tortelli men: Tortelli men draw women like flies; Tortelli men treat women like flies; Tortelli men's brains are in their flies".

  • Hi Scott, thanks for your solution, I'm really sorry I didn't see it before I posted my earlier reply. That's some helpful advice about UNPIVOT and CROSS APPLY. For someone with my experience I kinda know only what I need to know so this really is useful advice, thank you.

  • No problem.  I don't have a real problem with CROSS APPLY, other than the performance hit.  I personally am not a big fan of UNPIVOT, I find the syntax kludgy and limited, but others don't mind it.

    Here's an alternative coding of my approach that may be cleaner/clearer for some:

    SELECT
    Doc,
    SUM(CASE WHEN 'd' IN (Op1, Op2, Op3, Op4) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS total_d,
    SUM(CASE WHEN 'b' IN (Op1, Op2, Op3, Op4) AND 'd' IN (Op1, Op2, Op3, Op4)
    THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS total_b_and_d
    FROM dbo.Operation
    WHERE 'd' IN (Op1, Op2, Op3, Op4)
    GROUP BY Doc

     

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear." "Norm", on "Cheers". Also from "Cheers", from "Carla": "You need to know 3 things about Tortelli men: Tortelli men draw women like flies; Tortelli men treat women like flies; Tortelli men's brains are in their flies".

  • Scott, just asking for clarification.   You spoke of finding the UNPIVOT syntax kludgy (and I agree) but you posted the "crosstab" syntax which is the old-school way to PIVOT rows into columns.

    Did you mean to post CROSS APPLY with a values clause as an example of how  to UNPIVOT columns into rows?

     

     

     

     

    __________________________________________________

    Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
    Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills

  • Hmm, I don't believe I used a CROSS TAB.  Yes, I used a CASE in a SUM, but not in a CROSS TAB fashion, from my understanding of a CROSS TAB.  And I would not use a CROSS APPLY in this situation just because of the overhead.

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear." "Norm", on "Cheers". Also from "Cheers", from "Carla": "You need to know 3 things about Tortelli men: Tortelli men draw women like flies; Tortelli men treat women like flies; Tortelli men's brains are in their flies".

  • Summing case statements instead of doing a PIVOT, is referred to as a cross tab.

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/cross-tabs-and-pivots-part-1-%e2%80%93-converting-rows-to-columns-1

    Also, I hear you talking about the overhead of a CROSS APPLY.    I've never experienced any problems with it.    Cpuld you please give us some examples, timing comparisons, etc?

    I agree there is no need no need for CROSS APPLY when a simple join or existence test will do, but when you are looking for the latest sale for an account (for example) it can often speed things up significantly.

     

    __________________________________________________

    Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
    Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills

  • The Dixie Flatline wrote:

    Summing case statements instead of doing a PIVOT, is referred to as a cross tab.

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/cross-tabs-and-pivots-part-1-%e2%80%93-converting-rows-to-columns-1

    Exactly.  I used a CASE in a SUM but not instead of a PIVOT, so it's not really a cross tab, at least as I see it.

    Similarly, if I do a:

    SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN active = 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS inactive_count

    FROM dbo.some_table_name

    I've used a CASE within a SUM but, again, it's not a cross tab per se, or at least I don't see it as one.

    SQL DBA,SQL Server MVP(07, 08, 09) "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear." "Norm", on "Cheers". Also from "Cheers", from "Carla": "You need to know 3 things about Tortelli men: Tortelli men draw women like flies; Tortelli men treat women like flies; Tortelli men's brains are in their flies".

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply