Hacking to Hide

Question

Hacking to Hide

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004177 More actions · Answer 1

Amazing. I think these things are a bit crazy, whether they be shipboard or on airplanes, considering the technology that's been available for a relatively long time now. Systems similar to "OnStar" should be installed. That will not only give you constant updates via satellite but will also provide physical tamper information. Having these NOT report via satellite is kind of like putting your backups on the same drives as your databases.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 735657 More actions · Answer 2

Jeff Moden (1/7/2016)
Amazing. I think these things are a bit crazy, whether they be shipboard or on airplanes, considering the technology that's been available for a relatively long time now. Systems similar to "OnStar" should be installed. That will not only give you constant updates via satellite but will also provide physical tamper information. Having these NOT report via satellite is kind of like putting your backups on the same drives as your databases.

Satellites, nor connectivity, is not always reliable. You need some recorder that can store data locally.

chrisn-585491 SSCoach Points: 16006 More actions · Answer 3

For an interview with a black box designer and radio engineer, check out this podcast.

http://www.qsotoday.com/podcasts/zl1bpu

Warning: Some advance geek knowledge is required for complete appreciation of this gentleman's skills.

Robert Sterbal SSChampion Points: 11049 More actions · Answer 4

Wikipedia has a useful overview of some of the issues:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_recorder

412-977-3526 call/text

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004177 More actions · Answer 5

Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/8/2016)
Jeff Moden (1/7/2016)
Amazing. I think these things are a bit crazy, whether they be shipboard or on airplanes, considering the technology that's been available for a relatively long time now. Systems similar to "OnStar" should be installed. That will not only give you constant updates via satellite but will also provide physical tamper information. Having these NOT report via satellite is kind of like putting your backups on the same drives as your databases.
Satellites, nor connectivity, is not always reliable. You need some recorder that can store data locally.

Heh... yep... agree. That's what buffers are for. 🙂 The thing is that they have transmitters to identify the plane in flight and ground stations pick up on those. Dual coverage by satellite and ground station would do nicely.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

Gary Varga SSC Guru Points: 82166 More actions · Answer 6

The OS is a valid design consideration, however, it didn't stop encryption of the data, duplication / hash copies for validation nor auditing. The article points to system design flaws of which a more secure OS would only hide. For a while. Maybe.

Gaz

-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!