GROUP BY ALL

Question

GROUP BY ALL

Hugo Kornelis

SSC Guru

Points: 64790
More actions
August 2, 2008 at 12:49 pm

#190434

Comments posted to this topic are about the item GROUP BY ALL
Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: https://sqlserverfast.com/blog/
SQL Server Execution Plan Reference: https://sqlserverfast.com/epr/

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

hodgy SSCertifiable Points: 5906 More actions · Answer 1

I enjoyed this question (even though the clause is being phased out!) as it was something I wasn't aware of, and it made me go off and research the subject. Now I understand.

Tom

Life: it twists and turns like a twisty turny thing

Hugo Kornelis SSC Guru Points: 64790 More actions · Answer 2

hodgy (8/4/2008)
I enjoyed this question (even though the clause is being phased out!) as it was something I wasn't aware of, and it made me go off and research the subject. Now I understand.
Tom

Thanks, Tom!

And my apologies to everyone for the lousy formatting of the replies. All "&&"s were supposed to be replaced by line feeds, but that somehow didn't quite work out as expected. I've sent an email to Steve Jones, asking him to correct this, but given that it's deep night in his time zone, I don't expect this to happen for at least a few hours more. 🙁

Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: https://sqlserverfast.com/blog/
SQL Server Execution Plan Reference: https://sqlserverfast.com/epr/

SQLPhil SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4204 More actions · Answer 3

All "&&"s were supposed to be replaced by line feeds, but that somehow didn't quite work out as expected.

I did wonder. My eyes were going a little blurry trying to find the correct answer! 🙂

David McKinney SSChampion Points: 10472 More actions · Answer 4

Story of my life....

...I've discovered a new feature, just as it's being deprecated!

Alvin Ramard SSC-Forever Points: 41190 More actions · Answer 5

Don't feel bad David. You're not alone in this boat.

hmmmm ...... is it your turn to row?

Alvin Ramard
Memphis PASS Chapter[/url]

All my SSC forum answers come with a money back guarantee. If you didn't like the answer then I'll gladly refund what you paid for it.

For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]

Anipaul SSC-Insane Points: 24681 More actions · Answer 6

Anipaul

SSC-Insane

Points: 24681

August 6, 2008 at 12:15 am

#853631

Nice question.

Deepak Jain-691547 SSC-Addicted Points: 465 More actions · Answer 7

Deepak Jain-691547

SSC-Addicted

Points: 465

September 10, 2008 at 1:11 pm

#869926

A very good question. Thanks for posting this.:)

archu_223b4u Grasshopper Points: 17 More actions · Answer 8

Good question but can anyone help me where this is supports by SQL Server new version.

Hugo Kornelis SSC Guru Points: 64790 More actions · Answer 9

archu_223b4u (9/17/2008)
Good question but can anyone help me where this is supports by SQL Server new version.

It's still supported by SQL Server 2008, even though it's on the list of deprecated features. This means that nobody can tell (except maybe a few Mircosoft employees, but they won't) whether this feature will still be available in the next version of SQL Server (2011??), and whether some lower compatibility setting will be required by then.

In other words - start investigating your code now, and if you use this feature, plan to replace your code somewhere over the following years. There's no rush, but you shouldn't postpone it either. And you definitely should not use GROUP BY ALL in new work.

Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: https://sqlserverfast.com/blog/
SQL Server Execution Plan Reference: https://sqlserverfast.com/epr/