January 26, 2009 at 1:03 pm
It threw me. I assumed SSMS would behave the same way as isqlw so gave the wrong answer. I'm inclined to consider the SMSS behaviour a bug, as making sense out of using "go" as an identifier is just making it easier to write obscure bugs - but in fact SQLS 2000 isqlw is just as bad as small adjustments to the script can demonstrate.
Tom
June 25, 2009 at 6:54 am
That's what I like about QotD - the simplest questions are often the most thought provoking!
This definitely proves you should be careful what identifier names you choose.
December 11, 2012 at 3:19 am
gr888 question,,
GO GO GO 😛
_______________________________________________________________
To get quick answer follow this link:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply