January 26, 2009 at 1:03 pm
It threw me. I assumed SSMS would behave the same way as isqlw so gave the wrong answer. I'm inclined to consider the SMSS behaviour a bug, as making sense out of using "go" as an identifier is just making it easier to write obscure bugs - but in fact SQLS 2000 isqlw is just as bad as small adjustments to the script can demonstrate.
Tom
June 25, 2009 at 6:54 am
That's what I like about QotD - the simplest questions are often the most thought provoking!
This definitely proves you should be careful what identifier names you choose.
December 11, 2012 at 3:19 am
gr888 question,,
GO GO GO
_______________________________________________________________
To get quick answer follow this link:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy