June 27, 2008 at 8:00 am
Thanks for the feedback...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 28, 2008 at 12:42 am
Jim Russell (6/27/2008)
Jeff -- I am continually amazed at the effort you put in to help us all out. Thanks very much!!
I am with Jim on this one, it is people like you Jeff that make us want to strive to achieve so much more.
Even though we can make it work in 500 different ways, you always have the right way
~PD
June 28, 2008 at 10:40 am
pduplessis (6/28/2008)
Jim Russell (6/27/2008)
Jeff -- I am continually amazed at the effort you put in to help us all out. Thanks very much!!I am with Jim on this one, it is people like you Jeff that make us want to strive to achieve so much more.
Even though we can make it work in 500 different ways, you always have the right way
~PD
Now you guys are going to embarrass me :blush: Thanks guys...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 12, 2009 at 3:43 am
Hi,
Regarding this subject, I am battling in creating a proc to bcp distinct text files into distinct multi - tables by using one table as a parameter. The parameter table has all the table and file names. I have used cursors but their fail.
eg:
declare @filename varchar(100)
declare @bcpCommand as nvarchar(4000)
declare @defaultdirs as nvarchar(4000)
declare @dd as varchar(2)
--SET @bcpCommand = (' bcp General.dbo.'+@filename + ' in '+ @DefaultDirs +'\' +@filename +'.' + @dd + ' -T -f'+@DefaultDirs +'\Format\'+@filename +'.fmt' + ' -k -e'+@DefaultDirs +'\Error\'+@filename +'.err' )
--set @filename = (select DataSource FROM HO_Control_Table)
--select DataSource FROM HO_Control_Table
declare Next_Table_Cursor CURSOR FOR
select Filename FROM Parameter_Control_Table;
OPEN Next_Table_Cursor;
FETCH NEXT FROM Next_Table_Cursor;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
FETCH NEXT FROM Next_Table_Cursor;
END;
CLOSE Next_Table_Cursor;
DEALLOCATE Next_Table_Cursor;
GO
Please help!!
March 12, 2009 at 7:18 am
This should be posted as it's own topic, in the appropiate forum (which is probably NOT Integration Services). When you do, be sure to include the actual error message.
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 24, 2009 at 2:38 am
Hi Jeff Moden,
You have specified that instead of using While loop we can use set based code... Can you give us a idea of wat that set based code means and how to achieve that.
🙂
Cheers & Regards,
Kamal
March 24, 2009 at 5:03 am
A good starting point is in Jeffs sig:
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
There is deep wisdom in that...
September 21, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Hi,
It would be kind, if you explain set base code with suitable example.
Why we should use set base code instead of loop and cursor.
Tanks
[font="Verdana"]Regards
Kumar Harsh[/font]
September 23, 2009 at 6:51 am
pandeharsh (9/21/2009)
Hi,It would be kind, if you explain set base code with suitable example.
Why we should use set base code instead of loop and cursor.
Tanks
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=Why+we+should+use+set+base+code+instead+of+loop+and+cursor
example result: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/database/SetAndProceduralSQL.aspx?display=Print
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
September 23, 2009 at 7:18 am
jcrawf02 (9/23/2009)
pandeharsh (9/21/2009)
Hi,It would be kind, if you explain set base code with suitable example.
Why we should use set base code instead of loop and cursor.
Tanks
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=Why+we+should+use+set+base+code+instead+of+loop+and+cursor
...
Jon, did you actually try this? You should, especially the first results, ... 🙂
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
September 23, 2009 at 7:59 am
RBarryYoung (9/23/2009)
jcrawf02 (9/23/2009)
pandeharsh (9/21/2009)
Hi,It would be kind, if you explain set base code with suitable example.
Why we should use set base code instead of loop and cursor.
Tanks
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=Why+we+should+use+set+base+code+instead+of+loop+and+cursor
...
Jon, did you actually try this? You should, especially the first results, ... 🙂
I did, thought that was funny. Especially since the second one was the same question in a different thread.
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 40 (of 40 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply