September 30, 2013 at 8:38 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Extended Procs
September 30, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Nice question. Never even heard about it, made me do some research.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
October 1, 2013 at 12:10 am
easy point. 🙂
October 1, 2013 at 1:06 am
Not sure about this question.
I think there is no correct answer given, because even the link provided for SQL 2014 says "Topic Status: Some information in this topic is pre-release and subject to change in future releases"
Since SQL 2014 is not released yet, you can't be sure what will be in it or not. So I would have chosen "None of the above"
[font="Verdana"]Markus Bohse[/font]
October 1, 2013 at 1:18 am
MarkusB (10/1/2013)
Not sure about this question.I think there is no correct answer given, because even the link provided for SQL 2014 says "Topic Status: Some information in this topic is pre-release and subject to change in future releases"
Since SQL 2014 is not released yet, you can't be sure what will be in it or not. So I would have chosen "None of the above"
No, Markus, Dave62 is right!
Look at this document:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143729(v=sql.120).aspx
There also it is stated that this feature still exists and will be refused in future times. Just look for the key word "XP_API".
Or did I misunderstand you? You think that because it is pre-release it might change until the official release of SQL Server 2014? Then of course forget my remark above. I myself fought with this detail and decided to ignore it 😉
Best regards
Jens-Peter 🙂
Edit: detail etc.
________________________________________________________
If you set out to do something, something else must be done first.
October 1, 2013 at 1:35 am
Or did I misunderstand you? You think that because it is pre-release it might change until the official release of SQL Server 2014? Then of course forget my remark above.
That's exactly my point.
Even though it's not very likely, it might still change before the final release.
[font="Verdana"]Markus Bohse[/font]
October 1, 2013 at 2:14 am
Yes, that's correct. A better answer could have been "... is actually planned to be implemented in SQL Server 2014 ..."
Jens-Peter 🙂
________________________________________________________
If you set out to do something, something else must be done first.
October 1, 2013 at 3:14 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
October 1, 2013 at 4:31 am
I think that extended procedures are unremovable, also, if Microsoft discourages their use.
October 1, 2013 at 7:04 am
Good question. I had to research it as well, but never found anything conclusive either way. It came down to a guess between the last 2 and I got it right. I was leaning that way because I had a hard time seeing MS remove something that's so core to SQL Server as a type of OS within the actual OS. Granted, they've done it before.
October 1, 2013 at 7:35 am
Haven't had time to research SQL 2014 yet.
Guessed optimistically.
Got it wrong.
Can anyone explain why this should still be around when CLR has been available to replace its functionality since 2005?
October 1, 2013 at 7:59 am
Koen Verbeeck (9/30/2013)
Nice question. Never even heard about it, made me do some research.
+1 Good question. Never really used these, so it was good to do some research on it.
October 1, 2013 at 8:12 am
sknox (10/1/2013)
Haven't had time to research SQL 2014 yet.Guessed optimistically.
Got it wrong.
Can anyone explain why this should still be around when CLR has been available to replace its functionality since 2005?
Because of performance! CLR is very dangerous: bad written code can waste cpu time and memory resource.
October 1, 2013 at 8:15 am
nice question Dave62..
October 1, 2013 at 8:21 am
Carlo Romagnano (10/1/2013)
sknox (10/1/2013)
Haven't had time to research SQL 2014 yet.Guessed optimistically.
Got it wrong.
Can anyone explain why this should still be around when CLR has been available to replace its functionality since 2005?
Because of performance! CLR is very dangerous: bad written code can waste cpu time and memory resource.
And XPs can't!? :crazy:
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply