November 10, 2009 at 8:56 am
Hey everbody,
I have(or better yet tried to) create a cursor which acquires data from a table created from the union of two other tables in the same database, this is for all row that have column1 in table1 matching column2 in table2. Unfortunately the table formed doesn't seem to include the data gathered from the second select :unsure:
My Code for doing this is as below:
DECLARE CURS0 CURSOR FOR
SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, subqueryalias.col4, subqueryalias.col5, subqueryalias.col6
FROM (
SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM Table1 WHERE (EXISTS (SELECT col5 FROM Table2 WHERE col1 =c5))
UNION ALL
SELECT col4, col5, col6 FROM Table2
) as subqueryalias
WHERE subqueryalias.col1 = subqueryalias.col5
This causes Error 207: Invalid columns names 'col4','col5','col6'.
Col5 is flagged twice because its used in the where clause
Once I get rid of the invalid columns; so the SELECT Statement is just SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, the error disappears , but when i test the contents of the cursor, there is no data found.
I've been working at this for practically the whole day, so any help with overcoming the problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advanced 🙂
November 10, 2009 at 9:11 am
A union generates more rows not more columns. Does this return what you expect?
SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM Table1 WHERE (EXISTS (SELECT col5 FROM Table2 WHERE col1 =c5))
UNION ALL
SELECT col4, col5, col6 FROM Table2
There will only be 3 columns returned from this statement. Their headings would be col1, col2, col3. The data for col4, col5, col6 will be there but the first heaing will be used.
November 10, 2009 at 9:13 am
EK rook (11/10/2009)
Hey everbody,I have(or better yet tried to) create a cursor which acquires data from a table created from the union of two other tables in the same database, this is for all row that have column1 in table1 matching column2 in table2. Unfortunately the table formed doesn't seem to include the data gathered from the second select :unsure:
My Code for doing this is as below:
DECLARE CURS0 CURSOR FOR
SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, subqueryalias.col4, subqueryalias.col5, subqueryalias.col6
FROM (
SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM Table1 WHERE (EXISTS (SELECT col5 FROM Table2 WHERE col1 =c5))
UNION ALL
SELECT col4, col5, col6 FROM Table2
) as subqueryalias
WHERE subqueryalias.col1 = subqueryalias.col5
This causes Error 207: Invalid columns names 'col4','col5','col6'.
Col5 is flagged twice because its used in the where clause
Once I get rid of the invalid columns; so the SELECT Statement is just SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, the error disappears , but when i test the contents of the cursor, there is no data found.
I've been working at this for practically the whole day, so any help with overcoming the problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advanced 🙂
First of all, there is no col4, col5, col6 returned from the subquery. There are only 3 columns; col1, col2, col3.
You may want to take some time read a little more about UNION in BOL (MS SQL Server Books Online, the help system).
It may help if you would fully explain what it is you are trying to accomplish. Also, is a cursor really needed? There may be a set-based solution to your problem that will work better and be more scalable as well.
I'd also like to recommend that you read the first article I reference below in my signature block regarding asking for assistance. The more information you can provide, the better answers you will get in return.
November 10, 2009 at 10:33 am
Lynn Pettis (11/10/2009)
EK rook (11/10/2009)
Hey everbody,I have(or better yet tried to) create a cursor which acquires data from a table created from the union of two other tables in the same database, this is for all row that have column1 in table1 matching column2 in table2. Unfortunately the table formed doesn't seem to include the data gathered from the second select :unsure:
My Code for doing this is as below:
DECLARE CURS0 CURSOR FOR
SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, subqueryalias.col4, subqueryalias.col5, subqueryalias.col6
FROM (
SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM Table1 WHERE (EXISTS (SELECT col5 FROM Table2 WHERE col1 =c5))
UNION ALL
SELECT col4, col5, col6 FROM Table2
) as subqueryalias
WHERE subqueryalias.col1 = subqueryalias.col5
This causes Error 207: Invalid columns names 'col4','col5','col6'.
Col5 is flagged twice because its used in the where clause
Once I get rid of the invalid columns; so the SELECT Statement is just SELECT subqueryalias.col1, subqueryalias.col2, subqueryalias.col3, the error disappears , but when i test the contents of the cursor, there is no data found.
I've been working at this for practically the whole day, so any help with overcoming the problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advanced 🙂
First of all, there is no col4, col5, col6 returned from the subquery. There are only 3 columns; col1, col2, col3.
You may want to take some time read a little more about UNION in BOL (MS SQL Server Books Online, the help system).
It may help if you would fully explain what it is you are trying to accomplish. Also, is a cursor really needed? There may be a set-based solution to your problem that will work better and be more scalable as well.
I'd also like to recommend that you read the first article I reference below in my signature block regarding asking for assistance. The more information you can provide, the better answers you will get in return.
Ahh I wasn't aware the UNION only would used the columns just to return more rows. I must re think what how I am going to do this now . I will also look at the articles you referenced, thanks.
November 10, 2009 at 10:35 am
Matt Wilhoite (11/10/2009)
A union generates more rows not more columns. Does this return what you expect?
SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM Table1 WHERE (EXISTS (SELECT col5 FROM Table2 WHERE col1 =c5))
UNION ALL
SELECT col4, col5, col6 FROM Table2
There will only be 3 columns returned from this statement. Their headings would be col1, col2, col3. The data for col4, col5, col6 will be there but the first heaing will be used.
No :crying: it doesn't return what i was expecting hmm I was expecting a combination of all 6 columns but since UNION doesn't do this I will have to find another way, thanks for your help.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply