December 10, 2008 at 6:20 am
Nah... I'm with ya, Jeff. Temporary insanity on my part. Ignoring the dupes is intentionally destroying data in an unaccountable fashion and shouldn't be used. Sorry I ever brought it up especially since I've never actually put the darned thing into production for the reason stated.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2008 at 7:09 am
Jeff and Jeffrey,
Thanks to both of you. That seems like a very doable solution that will avoid the duplication. I really appreciate your help.
Pat
December 10, 2008 at 9:09 am
Jeffrey,
I made the changes you suggested and tested the report - it works perfectly!. Thanks so much.
Pat
December 10, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Patricia Monreal (12/10/2008)
Jeff and Jeffrey,Thanks to both of you. That seems like a very doable solution that will avoid the duplication. I really appreciate your help.
Pat
Thanks for the feedback, Pat... sorry for the temporary diversion down the primrose path.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Patricia Monreal (12/10/2008)
Jeffrey,I made the changes you suggested and tested the report - it works perfectly!. Thanks so much.
Pat
Hi Pat - thanks for the feedback. Glad this worked well for you.
Jeffrey Williams
“We are all faced with a series of great opportunities brilliantly disguised as impossible situations.”
― Charles R. Swindoll
How to post questions to get better answers faster
Managing Transaction Logs
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply