March 28, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Encryption
March 29, 2010 at 1:26 am
While the intent of the question is clear, there is currently some question as to the accuracy of the selected answer:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
(I got the answer "right", not looking for my point back, just thought it might be useful for people to know about this, as no-one is choosing AES 128-bit as the answer!)
http://poorsql.com for T-SQL formatting: free as in speech, free as in beer, free to run in SSMS or on your version control server - free however you want it.
March 29, 2010 at 2:24 am
thanks for the question... this is also a good link to look at...
http://www.kellermansoftware.com/t-ArticleStrongestAlgo.aspx
March 29, 2010 at 3:06 am
I too question the accuracy of the answer....and I DO want my point!!
March 29, 2010 at 8:16 am
Tao Klerks (3/29/2010)
While the intent of the question is clear, there is currently some question as to the accuracy of the selected answer:http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
That's a very interesting read. I got the answer "right" also simply because I though the AES-126 bit was a trick answer. I knew 126 bit didn't exist so I defaulted to AES 256 bit simply because it is a larger bit encryption.
March 29, 2010 at 9:58 am
Nice question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
March 29, 2010 at 2:57 pm
I imagine that the AES-126 bit answer is a typo.
Can we get it fixed to AES-128 bit?
March 29, 2010 at 3:05 pm
If AES 126 is NOT a typo, it is definitely out... but...
If AES 128 was what was meant, there is some argument in security circles as to whether AES 256 is actually STRONGER, although the length of the key suggests that it must be. Most security people I speak with agree that 256 is probably stronger but since none of us has the time to do a 149 trillion year crack, I guess we may never know.
Obviously any version of DES is weaker if you are familiar with the function of that algorithm although the key length may tempt you to believe otherwise 😀
Great question but the explanation does not begin to do justice to the answer.
Peter Trast
Microsoft Certified ...(insert many literal strings here)
Microsoft Design Architect with Alexander Open Systems
March 30, 2010 at 7:57 am
Good question. Thanks.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
April 2, 2010 at 2:21 pm
So, any consensus on whether or not AES-126 was meant to be a trick? I chose AES-256 based on that assumption.
Regards,
Mike M
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply