I had format the disk to 64KB and perform a test case using CrystalDiskMark. The result is under expectation. Why i cant get the 20% performance improvement if compare to the default disk format 4096 bytes?
Gail Shaw Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci) SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 1 (of 1 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply