Disabled Schedules

  • Comments posted to this topic are about the item Disabled Schedules

  • Nice easy one to start the week thanks Steve, perhaps a little close to the previous one though?

    ...

  • Oh got it wrong but good question!

    Is it odd that it says the QOTD was posted on 08/06/2017?
    Should it now have today's date?

    Robin

  • Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.

  • Nice, easy question to start the week on, thanks Steve

    ____________________________________________
    Space, the final frontier? not any more...
    All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
    “libera tute vulgaris ex”

  • A most unsurprising answer. Two options were effectively identical - so both had to be wrong. Another one sounded somewhat far-fetched. So, only the simplest - and correct - option remained.

  • Today's question is strikingly similar to the 6/27/2017 question.
    The good news is the the percentage of correct answers on today's question is higher than on the 6/27 question.  We're learning! <Smile>

  • robinwilson - Sunday, July 2, 2017 12:26 PM

    Oh got it wrong but good question!

    Is it odd that it says the QOTD was posted on 08/06/2017?
    Should it now have today's date?

    Robin

    You've mis-translated the date. This is June 8, 2017.

  • Mighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AM

    Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.

    That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AM

    Mighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AM

    Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.

    That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.

    we can go on into a copious amount of detail about everything that can start a job, irrespective of the job's own schedule, e.g. another job or a stored procedure or a process on another server, to name but a few.
    However, that is not what this question is asking.
    This question can (and should) be answered correctly by anyone with some DBA experience.

    ____________________________________________
    Space, the final frontier? not any more...
    All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
    “libera tute vulgaris ex”

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AM

    Mighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AM

    Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.

    That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.

    I agree that a manual start isn't a trigger. 

    But the explanation is still a bit inaccurate, since a trigger can call sp_start_job.    I have used that in error management, so it's not something obscure that no-one ever does.  Although getting developers and dbas to do error management with automatic containment in order to avoid having recover from a disaster can be rather difficult, there are quite a few of us who believe it's better to do error containment so as not to have a disaster to recover from wherever possible - but of course as it's not always possible we still have to plan for disaster revovery and test the disaster recovery process regularly).

    Tom

  • Stewart "Arturius" Campbell - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:32 AM

    Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AM

    Mighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AM

    Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.

    That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.

    we can go on into a copious amount of detail about everything that can start a job, irrespective of the job's own schedule, e.g. another job or a stored procedure or a process on another server, to name but a few.
    However, that is not what this question is asking.
    This question can (and should) be answered correctly by anyone with some DBA experience.

    Agreed.  It seemed like a simple one.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply