February 17, 2009 at 9:29 pm
True, and as much as I love the idea of that it's a time management thing as well.
I usually tend to do that sort of thing and then put my regular projects on hold when they shouldn't be. Kind of a fine balance.
I'll talk to her tomorrow and see some low-level details and see where I could go with it.
MCITP, Database Administrator
A hodgepodge of Information Technology and Life
LinkedIn Profile
My Twitter
February 17, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Jason Crider (2/17/2009)
True, and as much as I love the idea of that it's a time management thing as well.
Definitely understand that one. 😉
David
@SQLTentmaker“He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose” - Jim Elliot
February 18, 2009 at 12:05 pm
[font="Verdana"]I guess the thing that worries me is the thought that "so long as I'm not using a cursor, it's okay." It's not the cursor that is the problem, it's the row-by-row approach (that a cursor facilitates). What would have happened if your developer had written the code with a loop that didn't need a cursor, but still processed the result sets one row at a time?
The good news is that your developer came and spoke to you. That's a positive step. 😀
[/font]
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply