March 28, 2010 at 5:06 am
Hi All
Could anybody help regarding define Database sizing before deployment
Following are the initial figure
Below are details which you can use for DB sizing:
1. Call Volume per day ---- Mentioned in table below
2. Data Purging (No of days data needs to be available into DB) – Chandra would provide this data.
3. Three entries of each customer record in following databases:
- CalllistDB
- Reporting DB
- IVRDB
Based on the call projections provided, the AD sizing will be 4139 ports for this process. The BoM will be as follows:
Description
Factor
KK
Daily Call Volume
6,556,500
AD Full Call
25%
1,639,125
AD Short Call
75%
4,917,375
Operating hours of Auto Dialer per day
8
204,891
Operating hours of Auto Dialer per day
8
614,672
AD ports required for full call (AHT 60 Sec)
60
3,415
AD ports required for Short Call (AHT 6 Sec)
6
1,024
Total AD Ports Required
4,439
Existing AD ports
300
Additional AD ports Required
4,139
Additional IPCS Server required
300
14
Total E1 ports required
148
Existing E1 ports
10
Additional E1 ports
138
Additional Gateway required
9
Total BW Required
14.6
Existing BW
1.36
Additional BW Required with (in MB)
13.25
Additionl BW with 20% Add-on (in MB)
15.89
Thanks
Ghanshyam
March 28, 2010 at 5:53 am
Two suggestions:
1) format the tabular data into a form that we can use
2) take out any personally identifying information. We're not really in a position to contact Chandra for her data, and I doubt that she wants us to.
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 28, 2010 at 6:19 am
Also, see Estimating the Size of a Database in Books Online 😉
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
April 6, 2010 at 6:28 am
This is not a database point really, but the numbers provided imply that the ports used for autodial will all be 100% utilised throughout the 8 hour operational day. Your application will presumably work on a two level queuing system with a single 15-server (using the real servers) queue feeding 15 300-server (server = AD port) queues so getting it to load balance in such a way as to achieve constant 100% utilisation at the bottom end may well entail very large steady state queue lengths (particular if the two call types have variable duration, rather than constant) and it may be better to allow some margin to in the port count instead of planning on 100% utilisation - just as you have allowed a marging in the bandwidth.
Tom
June 26, 2010 at 9:12 pm
carolwood (6/26/2010)
Hello Friends.....Sizing a database can be one of the most arduous tasks a DBA, analyst or developer must attend to. It’s time consuming and more hours go into analyzing the database than actually sizing it. This article focuses on how to monitor the database’s growth after its deployed and contains some tips on how to size it before deployment. We will also dive a little into how to benchmark your database against a robust data load.
Thanks
Ummm.... WHICH article???
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 27, 2010 at 4:25 am
Jeff Moden (6/26/2010)
carolwood (6/26/2010)
Hello Friends.....Sizing a database can be one of the most arduous tasks a DBA, analyst or developer must attend to. It’s time consuming and more hours go into analyzing the database than actually sizing it. This article focuses on how to monitor the database’s growth after its deployed and contains some tips on how to size it before deployment. We will also dive a little into how to benchmark your database against a robust data load.
Thanks
Ummm.... WHICH article???
It's a spam post. Content copied from elsewhere, link in sig.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 27, 2010 at 10:15 am
GilaMonster (6/27/2010)
It's a spam post. Content copied from elsewhere, link in sig.
That's what I was starting to think because of other posts of that user.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 27, 2010 at 10:18 am
Dunno if anyone else has done it but.... reported.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply