August 23, 2010 at 7:25 am
I'll say this is one reason I think we need those yearly service packs. A more stable, tested version of patches that gets us to a level that can be used for applying future updates.
Note the CUs are cumulative, meaning that if you apply CU 8, the fixes from previous ones are a part of the codebase, so you need to be sure that you are testing for all fixes since the last service pack.
August 23, 2010 at 11:45 am
We are pretty much the same. We will only look at a CU if it fixes a specific issue we are having. We also lag on SPs until we see some feedback in the forums.
Mike
“I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”...Robert McCloskey
___________________________________________________________________
August 23, 2010 at 12:48 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (8/23/2010)
I'll say this is one reason I think we need those yearly service packs. A more stable, tested version of patches that gets us to a level that can be used for applying future updates.
I absolutely agree with that. If they'd get it down to a particular month of each year, then some reasonable FTE and /or PTE scheduling could be planned for on the regression testing.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply