Contained Database users

Question

Contained Database users

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

SSC Guru

Points: 736255
More actions
April 11, 2012 at 11:43 pm

#100838

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Contained Database users
April 12, 2012 at 2:36 am

This was removed by the editor as SPAM

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Henrico Bekker One Orange Chip Points: 27652 More actions · Answer 1

Good one on 2012 range of QOTD...havent seen too many yet.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This thing is addressing problems that dont exist. Its solution-ism at its worst. We are dumbing down machines that are inherently superior. - Gilfoyle

Koen Verbeeck SSC Guru Points: 259105 More actions · Answer 2

Nice question, always good to learn something new.

Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

DugyC Hall of Fame Points: 3804 More actions · Answer 3

Wasn't aware of Contained Databases, so learned something new again today.

Great questions, thanks Steve.

_____________________________________________________________________
[font="Comic Sans MS"]"The difficult tasks we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer"[/font]

Stuart Davies SSCoach Points: 19505 More actions · Answer 4

Another question from Steve on contained databases. I wonder what he has been playing around with?

😉

-------------------------------Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden [/url]Smart way to ask a question
There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand (the world). There is no such thing as a dumb question. ― Carl Sagan
I would never join a club that would allow me as a member - Groucho Marx

Thomas Abraham SSChampion Points: 10761 More actions · Answer 5

Thanks for giving me a reason to do some digging this morning. Learned a lot.

But, it's hard to concentrate, as I'm waiting for Steve to hit 30,000 points - kind of like waiting for your odometer to roll over. 😉

[font="Verdana"]Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.[/font]
Connect to me on LinkedIn

mtassin SSC-Insane Points: 23099 More actions · Answer 6

I was aware of what contained databases are...

At first I thought this was a trick question, because if you can't use AD credentials against a contained database then what good are they? After all the best practices recommendation is to use Windows authentication for everything SQL related.

Then I was like, ok so if it's a trick question, why would anybody want to use this? And then I was like, why in the world would you be able to only use groups or users but not both?

Finally I went with my original answer and got it right 🙂 Yay me?

--Mark Tassin
MCITP - SQL Server DBA
Proud member of the Anti-RBAR alliance.
For help with Performance click this link[/url]
For tips on how to post your problems[/url]

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 736255 More actions · Answer 7

The AD Credential thing is interesting. If there are matching AD credentials at the instance level, the authentication takes place there first, which makes sense. So if you move a partially contained database to a server that has a matching login, the login isn't contained.

Not a big deal, but interesting.

OzYbOi d(-_-)b SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4054 More actions · Answer 8

OzYbOi d(-_-)b

SSCarpal Tunnel

Points: 4054

April 12, 2012 at 8:29 am

#1472616

tks Steve

Cliff Jones SSChampion Points: 10547 More actions · Answer 9

Steve Jones - SSC Editor (4/12/2012)
The AD Credential thing is interesting. If there are matching AD credentials at the instance level, the authentication takes place there first, which makes sense. So if you move a partially contained database to a server that has a matching login, the login isn't contained.
Not a big deal, but interesting.

That is interesting. I was confused by Contained versus Partially Contained and assumed your question pertained to the former. Thanks for the interesting question.

Ken SSCoach Points: 17191 More actions · Answer 10

Thanks for the question Steve. This one forced me to do some research.

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 11

thanks steve

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 736255 More actions · Answer 12

Cliff Jones (4/12/2012)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (4/12/2012)
The AD Credential thing is interesting. If there are matching AD credentials at the instance level, the authentication takes place there first, which makes sense. So if you move a partially contained database to a server that has a matching login, the login isn't contained.
Not a big deal, but interesting.
That is interesting. I was confused by Contained versus Partially Contained and assumed your question pertained to the former. Thanks for the interesting question.

Contained Databases are only partially contained in SQL Server 2012. Hopefully SQL Server 2014/2015 will be completely contained.

Revenant SSC-Forever Points: 42467 More actions · Answer 13

Revenant

SSC-Forever

Points: 42467

April 12, 2012 at 12:03 pm

#1472833

Thanks for a straightforward question, Steve!