March 12, 2024 at 10:34 pm
Thanks if you can help.
I would like to SUM by Color but only if SampleType = 1.
I could do this with UNION ALL but I am wondering if I can eliminate the UNION ALL. If I can eliminate the UNION ALL I would then do some performance testing between the two methods.
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS #SampleData
CREATE TABLE #SampleData (Color VARCHAR(10), SampleType INT, SampleValue INT)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Blue',1,100)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Blue',1,101)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Blue',1,102)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Green',1,200)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Green',1,201)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Red',2,300)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Red',2,301)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Yellow',3,400)
INSERT INTO #SampleData (Color,SampleType,SampleValue)VALUES ('Yellow',3,401)
SELECT * FROM #SampleData
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT Color,SampleType,
SUM(SampleValue)OVER(PARTITION BY Color) AS SampleValue
FROM #SampleData WHERE SampleType = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM #SampleData WHERE SampleType <> 1
)SD
March 12, 2024 at 10:50 pm
Try
SUM(IIF(SampleType = 1, SampleValue,0))
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Martin Rees
The absence of consumable DDL, sample data and desired results is, however, evidence of the absence of my response
- Phil Parkin
March 12, 2024 at 11:27 pm
This seems to work but I somehow doubt it will perform any better.
SELECT
DISTINCT
Color,SampleType,
SUM(SampleValue)OVER(PARTITION BY CASE WHEN SampleType = 1 THEN Color ELSE CONVERT(VARCHAR(MAX),RowNum) END) AS SampleValue
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER()OVER (ORDER BY Color,SampleType,SampleValue ) AS RowNum,
Color,SampleType,SampleValue
FROM #SampleData
)SD
March 12, 2024 at 11:53 pm
It's a bit hacky, but this avoids the UNION ALL:
WITH Uniqued
AS (SELECT Grouper = IIF(sd.SampleType = 1, 1, CHECKSUM (*))
,sd.Color
,sd.SampleType
,sd.SampleValue
FROM #SampleData sd)
SELECT Uniqued.Color
,Uniqued.SampleType
,SUM (Uniqued.SampleValue)
FROM Uniqued
GROUP BY Uniqued.Grouper
,Uniqued.Color
,Uniqued.SampleType
ORDER BY Uniqued.SampleType
,Uniqued.Color;
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Martin Rees
The absence of consumable DDL, sample data and desired results is, however, evidence of the absence of my response
- Phil Parkin
March 13, 2024 at 12:16 am
SELECT Color,
SampleType,
SUM(SampleValue) SampleValue
FROM #SampleData
GROUP BY Color,
SampleType,
CASE WHEN SampleType = 1 THEN '1' ELSE CONVERT(char(36), NewId()) END
;
March 13, 2024 at 12:41 am
This might be more efficient:
;WITH CTE AS
(
SELECT *,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) rn
FROM #SampleData
)
SELECT Color,SampleType,SUM(SampleValue) SampleValue
FROM CTE
GROUP BY Color,
SampleType,
CASE WHEN SampleType = 1 THEN 0 ELSE rn END
;
March 13, 2024 at 2:41 pm
Thanks for all the solutions. I'll adapt to my actual DDL and report back If I uncover anything notable.
March 13, 2024 at 2:58 pm
If your actual tables include a PK not mentioned here, you may be able to use that to make your row unique, which would obviate the need for a derived 'row uniquer'.
CASE WHEN SampleType = 1 THEN 0 ELSE PK END
(From Jonathan's latest code)
This would remove the need for a CTE.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Martin Rees
The absence of consumable DDL, sample data and desired results is, however, evidence of the absence of my response
- Phil Parkin
March 13, 2024 at 3:16 pm
Good point. I have a composite primary key comprised of 3 INT columns.
Maybe.
CASE WHEN SampleType = 1 THEN 0 ELSE PK1 + PK2 + PK3 END
Although I guess the 3 numbers summed could produce duplicates. Casting to CHAR and concatenating would create a unique value but the cast could be a performance killer.
March 13, 2024 at 3:59 pm
You are right to consider the potential for duplicates. I can't think of an elegant (and fool-proof) way of handling the composite key – so I'd stick with Jonathan's suggestion.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Martin Rees
The absence of consumable DDL, sample data and desired results is, however, evidence of the absence of my response
- Phil Parkin
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply