March 16, 2020 at 12:00 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Combining many crossing intervals
March 16, 2020 at 1:36 am
Itzik Ben-Gan used 5 million rows (your "Source4") in his performance testing. What is the performance of your proposed Geometry method?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2020 at 9:33 pm
I have done some performance tests and the results are thus: proposed solution ~ 10 seconds (conversion and UnionAggregate), one of IBG solution 3 seconds.
April 3, 2020 at 2:38 pm
Thanks for the feedback. How did you load the polygon information for the test. I'm not so familiar with it and it seems like it only takes literal strings and no variables. I have no problem building a 5 million row table with coordinates but how to translate that into 5 million polygons with resorting to a wad of dynamic SQL to generate 5 million separate polygon commands?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply