Can this query be optimized

  • What is it about the 134 extra rows that make them wrong? That would help to see what is wrong with Peter's solution.

    Or that nothing is wrong with it.

    Tomm Carr
    --
    Version Normal Form -- http://groups.google.com/group/vrdbms

Viewing post 16 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply