March 2, 2010 at 11:11 pm
If u have a choice for SQL 2000,2005,2008. Which one make u to choose ?
Whatever the reason is.....
March 3, 2010 at 6:00 am
Don't understand the question.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
March 3, 2010 at 6:26 am
Are you asking which server version has the best performance?
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
March 3, 2010 at 9:24 pm
As a DBA, if u have a choice for 2000,2005,2008. Which one make u to choose ?
Whatever the reason .....
March 3, 2010 at 9:29 pm
Not exactly,Already i replied for Gilamonster......
"As a DBA, if u have a choice for 2000,2005,2008. Which one make u to choose ?
Whatever the reason is ....."
March 3, 2010 at 9:41 pm
"All the above" depending on what the customer has. It's also not a really good question because of things like the Enterprise Edition of any version is "better" than the other editions but is also more expensive. The correct answer for a new installation would be "the latest version at the highest Edition needed to get the job done".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2010 at 10:01 pm
....
March 3, 2010 at 10:03 pm
Yes Jeff u r right .Its all about what the customer has but what i want to know is only from the DBA's part.What DBA's like to go blindly...Anyway thank u for ur post.
March 4, 2010 at 6:11 am
Jeff Moden (3/3/2010)
"All the above" depending on what the customer has. It's also not a really good question because of things like the Enterprise Edition of any version is "better" than the other editions but is also more expensive. The correct answer for a new installation would be "the latest version at the highest Edition needed to get the job done".
I'd actually modify that to "the lowest edition needed to get the job done". If Express will do the job, why buy Enterprise? But I think that's what you meant in the first place.
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
March 4, 2010 at 6:12 am
Thamizh (3/3/2010)
As a DBA, if u have a choice for 2000,2005,2008. Which one make u to choose ?Whatever the reason .....
Everything else being equal, I'd choose 2008, for what I consider obvious reasons. Since that seems obvious to me, I was curious about why you were asking.
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
March 4, 2010 at 8:12 am
GSquared (3/4/2010)
Jeff Moden (3/3/2010)
"All the above" depending on what the customer has. It's also not a really good question because of things like the Enterprise Edition of any version is "better" than the other editions but is also more expensive. The correct answer for a new installation would be "the latest version at the highest Edition needed to get the job done".I'd actually modify that to "the lowest edition needed to get the job done". If Express will do the job, why buy Enterprise? But I think that's what you meant in the first place.
'zactley 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2010 at 8:15 am
Thamizh (3/3/2010)
Yes Jeff u r right .Its all about what the customer has but what i want to know is only from the DBA's part.What DBA's like to go blindly...Anyway thank u for ur post.
Then, like the other's implied, why wouldn't someone select the latest and greatest? 2k8 has some awesome DBA management tools in it and some optimizer enhancements that make life a bit easier.
Still, it doesn't matter which version you have nor how powerful the machine may be... incorrectly written code can cripple a Cray. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2010 at 12:49 am
The latest version loaded with all servicepacks, but check if your application vendor formal supports this version.
March 5, 2010 at 7:22 am
I agree that the question is somewhat very large and may be interpreted in many ways.
The way I did see it at first was (translating "best administrative performance")
"What version will make your life easier for trouble shooting issues and get most of the time the job done quicker"
And I do say that I prefer DMVs than the way sql 2000 worked for gathering metrics.
Again this question can be interpreted in many ways.
March 5, 2010 at 8:31 am
I prefer SQL 2000 because I can get more money as a consultant from clients with that platform because not as much information is exposed and thus I can know and do way more than most clients can. 😎
Best,
Kevin G. Boles
SQL Server Consultant
SQL MVP 2007-2012
TheSQLGuru on googles mail service
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply