November 20, 2007 at 9:00 am
Or, would you break the mirror and use 4 disks to create a Raid 1+0 and then the other three disks for Raid 5 (for TempDB & the user logs)?
November 20, 2007 at 9:34 am
I would keep 4 drives in raid 10 (user DBs, tempdb), use 2 drives in raid 1 (logs), maybe use the other drive to mirror the OS drive (assuming it is currently a single disk) or as a spare. That way the system can survive any one drive failure. An alternative might be to use raid 5 instead of raid 10 if there is very little write activity, but given the size of the databases I would expect the data to be largely cached anyway.
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 16 (of 16 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply