February 23, 2010 at 4:08 pm
jcrawf02 (2/23/2010)
Paul White (2/23/2010)
Will do. Be brutal 😀Dear Water, be wet. 😛
I was drinking Coca-Cola when I read that.
I now have a fizzing sensation in my nasal cavity.
I thought it was important to share that fact with the wider community.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:10 pm
Alvin Ramard (2/23/2010)
Before we say too much about Barry as MVP, there's a question that needs to be answered. Has he plagiarized enough articles or blog posts to become an MVP? 😛
Books, you forgot books 😀
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:21 pm
RBarryYoung (2/23/2010)
Umm, I fear I'm being dense, but what is [a Sequence Table]?
You'll have to wait for the article 😛
No, it's a physical table used to implement a custom sequence - a bit like IDENTITY on steroids.
It's often done badly, and has a poor reputation. There may be other (better?) names for it that I am unaware of.
The main use for it is in generating a sequence of values which are often used as key values.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:22 pm
I fear I may, in fact, be a nerd :unsure:
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:25 pm
RBarryYoung (2/23/2010)
Give it a go, Paul. The solution that we (independently) came up with is pretty darn efficient, so I would be particularly interested to see if a CLR solution come overcome the "call per row" penalty.
Coming right up! It will be a UDA - so there's no call-per-row penalty. It is entirely implemented as a Stream Aggregate operator directly in the plan. If I have my way, you'll see a scan of a covering NC index, a Segement, Sequence Project, and the Stream Aggregate. That's it.
RBarryYoung (2/23/2010)
As for the old Hammer saw (:-P), I actually would defend SQL as an appropriate and even preferred solution for this problem (barring really significant performance differences).
This will be fun!
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:26 pm
Barry, sourced, quoted, limited to < 1 para, fair use.
February 23, 2010 at 4:31 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (2/23/2010)
Barry, sourced, quoted, limited to < 1 para, fair use.
Thanks, Steve. good to know I still have some legal chops left... 🙂
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
February 23, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Paul White (2/23/2010)
I fear I may, in fact, be a nerd :unsure:
You know, it's still not too late to bite the head off a live chicken. ... Eh? :-D:-D:-D
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
February 23, 2010 at 4:36 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (2/23/2010)
Barry, sourced, quoted, limited to < 1 para, fair use.
Steve,
While I agree, my question is whether a quote from a paid subscription site (as where this quote is from), would constitute fair use?
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
February 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm
Most sources we use are paid for. There isn't a lot in the public domain. Posting a short excerpt from a book is no different than from a website. You have to give credit, and limit the copying. You also need to comment on it or use it to show a point. Not sure it as the basis for your work, but build on it.
February 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm
WayneS (2/23/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (2/23/2010)
Barry, sourced, quoted, limited to < 1 para, fair use.Steve, while I agree, my question is whether a quote from a paid subscription site (as where this quote is from), would constitute fair use?
That's agreeing? :unsure: 😉
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
February 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm
And I found another great question today. Someone hadn't had an answer in a few days, so they edited and removed their question.
Grrrrrrrreeeeeaaaaaaattttttttttt
February 23, 2010 at 6:01 pm
RBarryYoung (2/23/2010)
[/Quote]
In my limited experience, the Aussies usually think sheep jokes are funny cuz they're generally told on the Kiwis. I get the impression (from here in California) that it's much like the Minnesotans telling ice-fishing jokes on the North Dakotans. The rest of us end up just scratching our heads at the humor.
February 23, 2010 at 6:06 pm
GilaMonster (2/23/2010)
Are we geeks or not?
I know I must be one. My thought on seeing the 12000 mark go by was "less than 300 till the 12K mark."
February 23, 2010 at 6:20 pm
Paul White (2/23/2010)
jcrawf02 (2/23/2010)
Paul White (2/23/2010)
Will do. Be brutal 😀Dear Water, be wet. 😛
I was drinking Coca-Cola when I read that.
I now have a fizzing sensation in my nasal cavity.
I thought it was important to share that fact with the wider community.
Sure now call us fat 😉
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
Viewing 15 posts - 12,016 through 12,030 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply