September 8, 2016 at 8:40 am
djj (9/8/2016)
However, we have a couple of people that are of the old school "wait for the first service pack" that now with no service packs say "it is too new/unproven".
That attitude needs to go!
It took about a year for SQL 2014 to get a service pack, and iirc it had a nasty bug in it (or was that 2012 SP1?). A service pack is no guarantee of the product being bug free, and I'd argue with the number of people who hammered at the CTPs and RCs, it's more likely that an unspotted bug shows up in a SP (which the MVPs get maybe a week before release) than in the initial release (which we were hammering at for months).
Besides, the first CU is out, and the CUs now have the same language about applying them as SPs used to.
I'll be surprised if we have SP1 for 2016 available before July next year.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 8, 2016 at 9:05 am
I just received an email announcing that SQL Sentry's Plan Explorer PRO is now free! See this blog post[/url] for more details.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
September 8, 2016 at 9:11 am
Grant Fritchey (9/8/2016)
GilaMonster (9/8/2016)
djj (9/8/2016)
rodjkidd (9/8/2016)
SQLRNNR (9/7/2016)
rodjkidd (9/7/2016)
Simple things etc as they say...Just used Drop Table If Exists for the first time... I had a little smile to myself.... 🙂
Rodders...
It really is a nice addition. Not earth shattering for a feature but it sure is nice.
I agree - just pleased I remembered that I was on a 2016 instance, test, no 2016 prod servers here, and I could do that.
Rodders...
Been looking at 2016, and as I am no expert, what would be the reason for upgrading from 2008r2 to 2016 versus say 2014?
Query Store, Query Store, Query Store and Query Store
The other features and the overall speed improvements are also nice. The work needed to upgrade is the same whether 2014 or 2016, so no good reason to upgrade to something 2 years old.
This is double-extra true because 2014 or 2016, you have to deal with the new Cardinality Estimator and that's the biggest pain point for most people during the upgrade. Why not deal with that pain and get Query Store in the bargain instead of just dealing with the pain?
Since whether the new CE is used is based upon the database compatibility level, one of the recommended upgrade things to do is to upgrade to 2016, but leave the database in the older compatibility level. Turn on Query Store, and gather how your querys work now. Then update the compatibility level to use the new CE, and if you have queries with worse performance, you can use Query Store to force the query to use the older CE's execution plan that Query Store saved. So, not only can you get Query Store in the bargain, but you can use it to resolve your pain!
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
September 8, 2016 at 9:54 am
Grant Fritchey (9/8/2016)
djj (9/8/2016)
rodjkidd (9/8/2016)
SQLRNNR (9/7/2016)
rodjkidd (9/7/2016)
Simple things etc as they say...Just used Drop Table If Exists for the first time... I had a little smile to myself.... 🙂
Rodders...
It really is a nice addition. Not earth shattering for a feature but it sure is nice.
I agree - just pleased I remembered that I was on a 2016 instance, test, no 2016 prod servers here, and I could do that.
Rodders...
Been looking at 2016, and as I am no expert, what would be the reason for upgrading from 2008r2 to 2016 versus say 2014?
Query Store.
Extreme AG enhancements including a watered down AG in Standard edition.
RLS
Columnstore enhancements
native JSON
temporal
Other general performance enhancing features that are not legal for Olympians.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
September 8, 2016 at 10:41 am
SQLRNNR (9/8/2016)
Grant Fritchey (9/8/2016)
djj (9/8/2016)
rodjkidd (9/8/2016)
SQLRNNR (9/7/2016)
rodjkidd (9/7/2016)
Simple things etc as they say...Just used Drop Table If Exists for the first time... I had a little smile to myself.... 🙂
Rodders...
It really is a nice addition. Not earth shattering for a feature but it sure is nice.
I agree - just pleased I remembered that I was on a 2016 instance, test, no 2016 prod servers here, and I could do that.
Rodders...
Been looking at 2016, and as I am no expert, what would be the reason for upgrading from 2008r2 to 2016 versus say 2014?
Query Store.
Extreme AG enhancements including a watered down AG in Standard edition.
RLS
Columnstore enhancements
native JSON
temporal
Other general performance enhancing features that are not legal for Olympians.
Yeah, exactly, Query Store.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
September 8, 2016 at 7:10 pm
Other general performance enhancing features that are not legal for Olympians.
SOM 😀
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
September 8, 2016 at 7:11 pm
If any of you carnivores haven't tried "lacquered" bacon, you're missing a treat!
Edited to add:
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zeroooooooo....
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
September 8, 2016 at 9:26 pm
The Dixie Flatline (9/8/2016)
Other general performance enhancing features that are not legal for Olympians.
SOM 😀
Glad you liked it.:-D
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
September 9, 2016 at 1:32 am
The Dixie Flatline (9/8/2016)
If any of you carnivores haven't tried "lacquered" bacon, you're missing a treat!Edited to add:
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zeroooooooo....
Godwin's Law has been invoked. If he hadn't lost the argument before, he has now.
What's lacquered bacon?
How to post a question to get the most help http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537
September 9, 2016 at 1:35 am
BWFC (9/9/2016)
Godwin's Law has been invoked. If he hadn't lost the argument before, he has now.
Wow; never thought I'd see the day on a database forum.
September 9, 2016 at 1:46 am
The Dixie Flatline (9/8/2016)
If any of you carnivores haven't tried "lacquered" bacon, you're missing a treat!Edited to add:
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zero...
You can't divide by zeroooooooo....
And scalar UDFs are not faster than built-in functions.
Edit: And my desktop is not very happy about crunching 100 million rows. Good thing I upgraded the memory the other week (32GB on a gaming/dev/writing desktop!)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 9, 2016 at 3:11 am
BrainDonor (9/9/2016)
I've been following that thread since it started - fascinating. I'll give him full marks for determination ("Tis but a scratch" type of determination), but I'm so glad I'm not working with him.
OK. share.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
September 9, 2016 at 3:17 am
Grant Fritchey (9/9/2016)
BrainDonor (9/9/2016)
I've been following that thread since it started - fascinating. I'll give him full marks for determination ("Tis but a scratch" type of determination), but I'm so glad I'm not working with him.OK. share.
If you insist: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1815214-392-1.aspx
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 9, 2016 at 3:59 am
GilaMonster (9/9/2016)
Grant Fritchey (9/9/2016)
BrainDonor (9/9/2016)
I've been following that thread since it started - fascinating. I'll give him full marks for determination ("Tis but a scratch" type of determination), but I'm so glad I'm not working with him.OK. share.
If you insist: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1815214-392-1.aspx
Ah, the joys of being stupid (and I mean me), I can just walk away from something like this whistling.
:Whistling:
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
Viewing 15 posts - 55,696 through 55,710 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply