Are the posted questions getting worse?
-
Brandie Tarvin (1/20/2016)
Jacob Wilkins (1/19/2016)
Eirikur Eiriksson (1/19/2016)
GilaMonster (1/19/2016)
*sigh* All but one comment on a blog post are of the form 'Did you try X?' 'Have you compared Y?' 'Probably should have a test with Z'*NO. If I had, they would be in the post and besides it's not the point and wasn't what I was doing in the first place*
/rant
Must have missed that one, can you please post a link?
😎
Let me guess...http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2016/01/12/natively-compiled-user-defined-functions/?
The "have you tried SCHEMABINDING" on the comment was kind of funny in a sad "didn't you read the code before posting" kind of way.
The article was a good read, Gail.
Yes, good article Gail. The comments seemed to have missed the general idea behind that article (and the next one as well,) which (it seems to me) is "here's a fairly direct, simple, straight forward test of a very limited circumstance." Namely, will a native-compiled UDF perform better than a non-native-compiled or an in-line?
-
jasona.work (1/20/2016)
Brandie Tarvin (1/20/2016)
Jacob Wilkins (1/19/2016)
Eirikur Eiriksson (1/19/2016)
GilaMonster (1/19/2016)
*sigh* All but one comment on a blog post are of the form 'Did you try X?' 'Have you compared Y?' 'Probably should have a test with Z'*NO. If I had, they would be in the post and besides it's not the point and wasn't what I was doing in the first place*
/rant
Must have missed that one, can you please post a link?
😎
Let me guess...http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2016/01/12/natively-compiled-user-defined-functions/?
The "have you tried SCHEMABINDING" on the comment was kind of funny in a sad "didn't you read the code before posting" kind of way.
The article was a good read, Gail.
Yes, good article Gail. The comments seemed to have missed the general idea behind that article (and the next one as well,) which (it seems to me) is "here's a fairly direct, simple, straight forward test of a very limited circumstance." Namely, will a native-compiled UDF perform better than a non-native-compiled or an in-line?
Nice article, Gail. I thought it was very straightforward and the point was simple and clear. I don't get why some didn't get it.
-
Ed Wagner (1/20/2016)
jasona.work (1/20/2016)
Brandie Tarvin (1/20/2016)
Jacob Wilkins (1/19/2016)
Eirikur Eiriksson (1/19/2016)
GilaMonster (1/19/2016)
*sigh* All but one comment on a blog post are of the form 'Did you try X?' 'Have you compared Y?' 'Probably should have a test with Z'*NO. If I had, they would be in the post and besides it's not the point and wasn't what I was doing in the first place*
/rant
Must have missed that one, can you please post a link?
😎
Let me guess...http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2016/01/12/natively-compiled-user-defined-functions/?
The "have you tried SCHEMABINDING" on the comment was kind of funny in a sad "didn't you read the code before posting" kind of way.
The article was a good read, Gail.
Yes, good article Gail. The comments seemed to have missed the general idea behind that article (and the next one as well,) which (it seems to me) is "here's a fairly direct, simple, straight forward test of a very limited circumstance." Namely, will a native-compiled UDF perform better than a non-native-compiled or an in-line?
Nice article, Gail. I thought it was very straightforward and the point was simple and clear. I don't get why some didn't get it.
Because it didn't solve their problem / answer their question?
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
If you can't explain to another person how the code that you're copying from the internet works, then DON'T USE IT on a production system! After all, you will be the one supporting it!
Links:
For better assistance in answering your questions
Performance Problems
Common date/time routines
Understanding and Using APPLY Part 1 & Part 2 -
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."
All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore RooseveltAuthor of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning -
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
Is The Thread getting an award for being the longest running, most active thread on ssc?
-
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
How many posters we got on this thread?
YO!
...
Keep posting threadizens!
😀
-
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
"... like "an exponentially growing log file."? Somebody needs to enable the transaction log backups!!! 😀
Alvin Ramard
Memphis PASS Chapter[/url]All my SSC forum answers come with a money back guarantee. If you didn't like the answer then I'll gladly refund what you paid for it.For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
-
Lynn Pettis (1/20/2016)
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
Is The Thread getting an award for being the longest running, most active thread on ssc?
That is fantastic!
Rodders...
-
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
Wait, wait, wait...
It's only a 65MB thread?
C'mon people, we're slacking!
Make use of those NVARCHAR(MAX)es!
-
This is, potentially, the longest thread on the Internet. I'm not sure I've seen anything continue this long, for this length. We were, by far, the largest user of this forum software, and larger than any other .NET forums I've seen.
-
Lynn Pettis (1/20/2016)
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
Is The Thread getting an award for being the longest running, most active thread on ssc?
Well... yeah... that was it.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore RooseveltAuthor of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning -
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/20/2016)
This is, potentially, the longest thread on the Internet. I'm not sure I've seen anything continue this long, for this length. We were, by far, the largest user of this forum software, and larger than any other .NET forums I've seen.There seem to be some threads made specifically to be the longest thread, but are full of nonsense. There's however, one thread in the GateWorld forum that is now closed because it was causing problems to the whole forum. It's called The GareWorld Cantina and has 679 862 posts.
BTW, I had to Google for this.
-
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/20/2016)
This is, potentially, the longest thread on the Internet. I'm not sure I've seen anything continue this long, for this length. We were, by far, the largest user of this forum software, and larger than any other .NET forums I've seen.It's not the size, its the quality;-)
😎
-
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (1/20/2016)
This is, potentially, the longest thread on the Internet. I'm not sure I've seen anything continue this long, for this length. We were, by far, the largest user of this forum software, and larger than any other .NET forums I've seen.And yet, the site still works. Sure, it has the quote bug and a glitch or slowdown from time to time, but just look at it. I'd say it's a job well done.
Tell me The Thread's award is not that it's going to be killed off. I've come to enjoy it. It's a lot like a pressure release valve that releases pressure slowly to prevent explosions. I know I don't want to explode. 😉
Look at all the cool things to come out of The Thread. There's the Pork Chop Launcher (plus variants), DBCC TIMEWARP and the Hippo Guarding the Tent in the Dessert.
-
Alvin Ramard (1/20/2016)
Grant Fritchey (1/20/2016)
Sitting in a meeting at Redgate talking about plans for SQL Server Central. THE THREAD has come up as a topic. We are currently a 65mb thread. It evidently looks like "an exponentially growing log file."All I can say is...
WELL DONE!
Keep it up. Good job everyone.
"... like "an exponentially growing log file."? Somebody needs to enable the transaction log backups!!! 😀
Please see the Stairway to Transaction Log Management at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/stairway/73776/. 😀
Viewing 15 posts - 52,276 through 52,290 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply