May 8, 2014 at 8:48 am
May 8, 2014 at 9:26 am
Always was going to happen. The more people that visit, the more likely you have to get lower and lower skill levels.
May 8, 2014 at 9:38 am
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.
May 8, 2014 at 10:03 am
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.
+~. I completely agree.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
May 8, 2014 at 10:08 am
WayneS (5/8/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.+~. I completely agree.
Question is, is your comment positive, negative, or approxamate-ive (sorry Jason, "approxamateve")
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
May 8, 2014 at 10:36 am
jcrawf02 (5/8/2014)
WayneS (5/8/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.+~. I completely agree.
Question is, is your comment positive, negative, or approxamate-ive (sorry Jason, "approxamateve")
I'm sure he meant "+8"
I would agree as well if that was the intention.:-D
May 8, 2014 at 10:40 am
Luis Cazares (5/8/2014)
jcrawf02 (5/8/2014)
WayneS (5/8/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.+~. I completely agree.
Question is, is your comment positive, negative, or approxamate-ive (sorry Jason, "approxamateve")
I'm sure he meant "+8"
I would agree as well if that was the intention.:-D
That was how I read it.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
May 8, 2014 at 11:15 am
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.
I spend time reading over there because they do get the google hits to questions and obviously they cover a wider range of topics which suits me in many situations. As for "quality of people", I haven't seen any full on loony toons over there yet.
May 8, 2014 at 2:16 pm
Lynn, could you please pm me your current email address?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 9, 2014 at 1:35 pm
Sean Lange (5/8/2014)
Luis Cazares (5/8/2014)
jcrawf02 (5/8/2014)
WayneS (5/8/2014)
Ed Wagner (5/8/2014)
No real surprise there. I checked out the site quite some time ago and remarked to myself how miserable the questions were. I also saw that many times, the answers don't really answer the question. I've heard of long answers (say, to a complex question) are just deleted for some reason. For these reasons, the link above is the first time I've been there in well over a year. I like SSC better anyway...better people, better focus and better solutions.+~. I completely agree.
Question is, is your comment positive, negative, or approxamate-ive (sorry Jason, "approxamateve")
I'm sure he meant "+8"
I would agree as well if that was the intention.:-D
That was how I read it.
Yep, that was what I meant. (Can never find that infinity keystroke when I need it)
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
May 12, 2014 at 2:39 am
Problem is, there's no standard method for that which works world-wide. If you're using codepage 437 (which I believe US versions of Windows do) then holding Alt while typing 236 on the numeric keypad will give infinity, but that doesn't work for codepage 850 (UK). There's a way of using the same method to enter hexadecimal Unicode codes (in which case, +221E would work), but you have to hack the registry and reboot your machine to use it!
May 12, 2014 at 4:49 am
*sigh* http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1569693.aspx
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 12, 2014 at 4:57 am
GilaMonster (5/12/2014)
*sigh* http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1569693.aspx
Why do some people bother to post "advice" (and apparently incorrect) on an almost 4 year old topic?
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
May 12, 2014 at 5:07 am
Koen Verbeeck (5/12/2014)
GilaMonster (5/12/2014)
*sigh* http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1569693.aspxWhy do some people bother to post "advice" (and apparently incorrect) on an almost 4 year old topic?
Advertisement for their database 'recovery' product. Look at where the www link goes. I suspect the posts (and the older ones from http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/UserInfo979672.aspx) are at least partially to generate links to the sites for better position in the search engines
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
May 12, 2014 at 5:13 am
I remember reading blog post or article about calculating running total so that you needed to fetch only the last row. It involved some extra column for referential integrity. I have same need, but I just cannot remember where I read it.
Any ideas where this could have been.
Viewing 15 posts - 43,876 through 43,890 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply