October 19, 2012 at 10:23 am
WayneS (10/19/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/18/2012)
Stuart Davies (10/18/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (10/17/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
As long as I know you know, it doesn't matter if you know you know. You knowing I know you know should satisfy you since if I know you know, even if I know you don't know you know, you get the job, you know?
But also don't forget that:- We know there are known knowns: there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns: that is to say we know there are things we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know
Brilliant!
Best summarized by:
(of course, the stuff you know you know slice is too big here, but you get the idea)
That's good, but it is missing the slice of "things you think you know, but are wrong about"
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
It’s unpleasantly like being drunk.
What’s so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
October 19, 2012 at 10:25 am
Stefan Krzywicki (10/19/2012)
WayneS (10/19/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/18/2012)
Stuart Davies (10/18/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (10/17/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
As long as I know you know, it doesn't matter if you know you know. You knowing I know you know should satisfy you since if I know you know, even if I know you don't know you know, you get the job, you know?
But also don't forget that:- We know there are known knowns: there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns: that is to say we know there are things we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know
Brilliant!
Best summarized by:
(of course, the stuff you know you know slice is too big here, but you get the idea)
That's good, but it is missing the slice of "things you think you know, but are wrong about"
Uh... I think you're wrong about that.
Wait, I just proved your point.
October 19, 2012 at 11:10 am
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 19, 2012 at 11:12 am
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.
No, I've been seeing it too. I'm off to monitor.red-gate.com to see if I can see it in the metrics.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
October 19, 2012 at 11:13 am
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.
Yes - I have seen it too and it has been painful.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
October 19, 2012 at 11:14 am
Grant Fritchey (10/19/2012)
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.No, I've been seeing it too. I'm off to monitor.red-gate.com to see if I can see it in the metrics.
Oddly enough as soon as I posted that it seems to be normal again. Maybe the server read my post and straightened up. 😛
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 19, 2012 at 11:17 am
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.
SSC is slow for me, as is another site that I know is hosted in London, so wondering if they're related.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 19, 2012 at 11:19 am
GilaMonster (10/19/2012)
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.SSC is slow for me, as is another site that I know is hosted in London, so wondering if they're related.
I'm not seeing any indication of issues from the database side of things, so I suspect the problem lies elsewhere.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
October 19, 2012 at 11:49 am
SQLRNNR (10/19/2012)
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.Yes - I have seen it too and it has been painful.
Ditto. But then, I've been seeing it in a few other sites, so thought it was just me.
October 19, 2012 at 12:10 pm
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.
I came to this forum just now to ask if anyone else had noticed it - I've been having click response usually in the 10s of seconds all day, I've checked loop delay a few times using ping, a few times using tracert, it's been consistently under 100ms (even during those 10s+ waits). No other sites are giving me this problem.
Tom
October 19, 2012 at 12:35 pm
L' Eomot Inversé (10/19/2012)
Sean Lange (10/19/2012)
Is it just me or is the entire SSC site slow today? For me I can barely navigate anywhere. Each click is taking a couple minutes. No other sites are slow at all.I came to this forum just now to ask if anyone else had noticed it - I've been having click response usually in the 10s of seconds all day, I've checked loop delay a few times using ping, a few times using tracert, it's been consistently under 100ms (even during those 10s+ waits). No other sites are giving me this problem.
I did have a REALLY cranky post submission earlier (locked up IE entirely), but I was chalking it up to taking too long to type it in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?
October 19, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Chad Crawford (10/19/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (10/19/2012)
WayneS (10/19/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/18/2012)
Stuart Davies (10/18/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (10/17/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
As long as I know you know, it doesn't matter if you know you know. You knowing I know you know should satisfy you since if I know you know, even if I know you don't know you know, you get the job, you know?
But also don't forget that:- We know there are known knowns: there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns: that is to say we know there are things we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know
Brilliant!
Best summarized by:
(of course, the stuff you know you know slice is too big here, but you get the idea)
That's good, but it is missing the slice of "things you think you know, but are wrong about"
Uh... I think you're wrong about that.
Wait, I just proved your point.
No, that's part of the yelllow slice, not a separate slice. The apparently missing slice is "things you don't realise you know" (which is the second smallest of the four slices). What might have happened is that the label for that slice got lost, and the label for the "things the know you know" slice is pointing to it instead of to the invisible (because it's so small) slice that it's the label for.
Of course subdividing the yellow slice, to get 5 slices instead of 4 would make things look a bit more balanced. But the largest slice would still be bigger that the other 4 put together (in fact each slice would be bigger that all smaller slices added together) and the "things you know that you know" slice would still be almost invisible. The slice sizes would then be
57%: Things you think you know but are wrong.
22%: Other things you don't realise you don't know.
16% Things you realise you don't know.
4.5%: Things you don't realise you know.
0.5%: Things you realize you know.
Tom
October 19, 2012 at 1:29 pm
Bit slow for me as well, even pulling up a response page, and I'm trying to play catchup for the entire week. I think I'll just chalk it up to meh and keep trucking. Got hit by that really nasty flu bug, laid me out hardcore over the last week. If I missed anything important or left a thread hanging someone ping me on it? Thanks.
Never stop learning, even if it hurts. Ego bruises are practically mandatory as you learn unless you've never risked enough to make a mistake.
For better assistance in answering your questions[/url] | Forum Netiquette
For index/tuning help, follow these directions.[/url] |Tally Tables[/url]
Twitter: @AnyWayDBA
October 21, 2012 at 9:26 am
Stefan Krzywicki (10/19/2012)
WayneS (10/19/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/18/2012)
Stuart Davies (10/18/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (10/17/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
As long as I know you know, it doesn't matter if you know you know. You knowing I know you know should satisfy you since if I know you know, even if I know you don't know you know, you get the job, you know?
But also don't forget that:- We know there are known knowns: there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns: that is to say we know there are things we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know
Brilliant!
Best summarized by:
(of course, the stuff you know you know slice is too big here, but you get the idea)
That's good, but it is missing the slice of "things you think you know, but are wrong about"
Wouldn't that fall under the things you don't know you don't know...? Seems so to me...
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
October 22, 2012 at 4:35 am
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The PI! It needs more slices![/font]
You know what I hate about pie charts?
You can never tell what filling they're using. And it's awfully hard to stick a spoon in there and scoop out the filling (no crust) without the whole chart collapsing.
SIGH.
Viewing 15 posts - 38,146 through 38,160 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply