October 16, 2012 at 6:51 am
Grant Fritchey (10/16/2012)
It is hard to figure out how to deal with wildly deviant feedback. "Best session of the day" and "Whiny dick" were two of the feedback I got in OKC at SQL Saturday. How do you reconcile that? You don't. But you can't simply ignore the stuff you don't like and why would you ignore the stuff you like?I try not to let the really negative stuff get me down, but I try to figure out if there is a grain of truth in it. The OKC presentation, I did spend too much time on a section of the presentation that should have only been 10-15 minutes. I think that put the presentation off and at least somewhat contributed to the bad remarks (from only two people, but still). Without the bad comments, I don't know that I would have done the belly-button gazing that, potentially, means I can improve this presentation.
I don't see why the best session of the day can't be given by a "whiny dick". : -)
I think people who focus on things like the presenter's voice or personality or other peripheral things like that tend to be people who didn't understand the material and are looking for a way of expressing frustration where they don't have to admit they didn't understand.
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
Itβs unpleasantly like being drunk.
Whatβs so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
October 16, 2012 at 12:21 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/16/2012)
It is hard to figure out how to deal with wildly deviant feedback. "Best session of the day" and "Whiny dick" were two of the feedback I got in OKC at SQL Saturday. How do you reconcile that? You don't. But you can't simply ignore the stuff you don't like and why would you ignore the stuff you like?I try not to let the really negative stuff get me down, but I try to figure out if there is a grain of truth in it. The OKC presentation, I did spend too much time on a section of the presentation that should have only been 10-15 minutes. I think that put the presentation off and at least somewhat contributed to the bad remarks (from only two people, but still). Without the bad comments, I don't know that I would have done the belly-button gazing that, potentially, means I can improve this presentation.
Just remember, that person decided to stay and listen to the whiny dick's session when he could have left and gone to another session.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
October 16, 2012 at 4:36 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/16/2012)
It is hard to figure out how to deal with wildly deviant feedback. "Best session of the day" and "Whiny dick" were two of the feedback I got in OKC at SQL Saturday. How do you reconcile that? You don't. But you can't simply ignore the stuff you don't like and why would you ignore the stuff you like?I try not to let the really negative stuff get me down, but I try to figure out if there is a grain of truth in it. The OKC presentation, I did spend too much time on a section of the presentation that should have only been 10-15 minutes. I think that put the presentation off and at least somewhat contributed to the bad remarks (from only two people, but still). Without the bad comments, I don't know that I would have done the belly-button gazing that, potentially, means I can improve this presentation.
I didn't put my name on the comment card did I?;-)
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
October 16, 2012 at 4:41 pm
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.
It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 16, 2012 at 5:06 pm
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
Umm - easy one. It is called Timex:hehe:
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
October 16, 2012 at 6:42 pm
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time
Perhaps he was so focused on the future he's never interested in the temporal currency. π
My thought question: Have you ever been told that your query runs too fast?
My advice:
INDEXing a poor-performing query is like putting sugar on cat food. Yeah, it probably tastes better but are you sure you want to eat it?
The path of least resistance can be a slippery slope. Take care that fixing your fixes of fixes doesn't snowball and end up costing you more than fixing the root cause would have in the first place.
Need to UNPIVOT? Why not CROSS APPLY VALUES instead?[/url]
Since random numbers are too important to be left to chance, let's generate some![/url]
Learn to understand recursive CTEs by example.[/url]
[url url=http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/St
October 17, 2012 at 4:31 am
dwain.c (10/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and timePerhaps he was so focused on the future he's never interested in the temporal currency. π
He's not an "in" member of the SQL Conspiracy, so doesn't know the truth about DBCC TimeWarp. Don't hold it against him.
October 17, 2012 at 5:59 am
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
dwain.c (10/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and timePerhaps he was so focused on the future he's never interested in the temporal currency. π
He's not an "in" member of the SQL Conspiracy, so doesn't know the truth about DBCC TimeWarp. Don't hold it against him.
Wait, I thought DBCC TimeWarp was being deprecated in favor of SP_Flux_Capacitor_1.21GW?
October 17, 2012 at 7:37 am
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
Hopefully it was just a phone interview...
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
October 17, 2012 at 8:02 am
WayneS (10/17/2012)
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
Hopefully it was just a phone interview...
Nope... I always do these things in person. If someone is skilled at Google, it's too darned easy for them to do a quick lookup during a phone interview. Didn't really take any more time than it would have during a phone interview.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2012 at 8:04 am
SQLRNNR (10/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
Umm - easy one. It is called Timex:hehe:
BWWAAA-HAAAA!!!! If the candidate actually had a sense of humor like that, the interview may have lasted longer! π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2012 at 8:19 am
jasona.work (10/17/2012)
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
dwain.c (10/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and timePerhaps he was so focused on the future he's never interested in the temporal currency. π
He's not an "in" member of the SQL Conspiracy, so doesn't know the truth about DBCC TimeWarp. Don't hold it against him.
Wait, I thought DBCC TimeWarp was being deprecated in favor of SP_Flux_Capacitor_1.21GW?
No the new version of DBCC TimeWarp call that as a CLR. π
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 β Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 17, 2012 at 8:20 am
Jeff Moden (10/16/2012)
Wow... recent interview of a Web Developer interviewee just set a new record. Interviewee claimed 14 years experience in SQL (mostly Oracle) and 5 years recent experience with SQL Server... and he couldn't name the function to get the current date and time in either. The resume also had on it that he had created stored procedures but then admitted that he never really created any... he just supposedly fixed them.It was one of the shortest interviews I've ever conducted with anyone for any job.
Jeff how dare you question somebody about the contents of their resume to see if it is actually true. What is this world coming to?? At least you didn't have to waste much time.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 β Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 17, 2012 at 8:26 am
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.
Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
October 17, 2012 at 8:34 am
Brandie Tarvin (10/17/2012)
It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say. Why do you want to know what I know I know? It's a disgrace, a disgrace I say.Young fella, do you even know what a chicken hawk is?
As long as I know you know, it doesn't matter if you know you know. You knowing I know you know should satisfy you since if I know you know, even if I know you don't know you know, you get the job, you know?
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
Itβs unpleasantly like being drunk.
Whatβs so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
Viewing 15 posts - 38,086 through 38,100 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply