August 3, 2012 at 5:06 am
WayneS (8/2/2012)
I was checking SQLSat156 (Providence, RI) to see if the speakers had been selected yet, and I count 5 Threadizens that have submitted for it. Sure would be nice if all of us get selected.
don't quote me, but I think everyone who submitted will likely get selected.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
August 3, 2012 at 7:03 am
Grant Fritchey (8/3/2012)
don't quote me
My rebellious side could not resist.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
August 3, 2012 at 7:22 am
WayneS
I was checking SQLSat156 (Providence, RI) to see if the speakers had been selected yet, and I count 5 Threadizens that have submitted for it. Sure would be nice if all of us get selected.
Did a quick check a few minutes ago and found the following scheduled for at least 1 presentation,. So would say you will meet
Jason Brimhall, Grant Fritchey,Jeff Moden and Jack Corbett
August 3, 2012 at 7:26 am
bitbucket-25253 (8/3/2012)
WayneS
I was checking SQLSat156 (Providence, RI) to see if the speakers had been selected yet, and I count 5 Threadizens that have submitted for it. Sure would be nice if all of us get selected.
Did a quick check a few minutes ago and found the following scheduled for at least 1 presentation,. So would say you will meet
Jason Brimhall, Grant Fritchey,Jeff Moden and Jack Corbett
If anyone's interested, I started a general SQL Saturday thread over here . . .
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Check out my blog at https://pianorayk.wordpress.com/
August 3, 2012 at 10:02 am
Philisophical SQL Server question
One big SSIS package with calls to sps in addition to the SSIS tasks
or lots of little SSIS packages grouped into a job with the sps as steps in the job?
There's pros & cons to both and I can't decide.
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
It’s unpleasantly like being drunk.
What’s so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
August 3, 2012 at 10:04 am
Added my note to the SQLSat thread.
I'd like to do more, but with 6 SQL in the City dates + Connections, rather booked up for a few months.
August 3, 2012 at 10:17 am
bitbucket-25253 (8/3/2012)
WayneS
I was checking SQLSat156 (Providence, RI) to see if the speakers had been selected yet, and I count 5 Threadizens that have submitted for it. Sure would be nice if all of us get selected.
Did a quick check a few minutes ago and found the following scheduled for at least 1 presentation,. So would say you will meet
Jason Brimhall, Grant Fritchey,Jeff Moden and Jack Corbett
Cool! Looking forward to a nice lunch with the gang then.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
August 3, 2012 at 10:58 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/2/2012)
Just a quick reminder here to everyone. This is a public forum, so the things you post are tied to you and available for everyone to see.Just like an email, think before you post too emotionally. It reflects on you.
I can't take it anymore! The Dark Side Cookies, they must be destroyed!
Sorry. Couldn't resist.
August 3, 2012 at 1:26 pm
FYI, since some of you submit questions. I'm no longer accepting images of code.
Please feel free to debate me.
August 3, 2012 at 3:35 pm
The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. - Stephen Hawking
August 3, 2012 at 4:02 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/3/2012)
FYI, since some of you submit questions. I'm no longer accepting images of code.Please feel free to debate me.
After making an *** of myself on today's QotD image, I'm not going disagree with you!
Tom
August 3, 2012 at 4:18 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (8/3/2012)
Philisophical SQL Server questionOne big SSIS package with calls to sps in addition to the SSIS tasks
or lots of little SSIS packages grouped into a job with the sps as steps in the job?
There's pros & cons to both and I can't decide.
For me, neither. I haven't found a need to use SSIS yet because I can do everything I need to in T-SQL. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2012 at 7:20 pm
Jeff Moden (8/3/2012)
Stefan Krzywicki (8/3/2012)
Philisophical SQL Server questionOne big SSIS package with calls to sps in addition to the SSIS tasks
or lots of little SSIS packages grouped into a job with the sps as steps in the job?
There's pros & cons to both and I can't decide.
For me, neither. I haven't found a need to use SSIS yet because I can do everything I need to in T-SQL. 🙂
Well : -P to you then. 🙂
I find importing files much easier in SSIS. A few other things are easier there too. Not that they can't be done in T-SQL, they're just either a little faster or easier in SSIS.
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
It’s unpleasantly like being drunk.
What’s so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
August 3, 2012 at 7:36 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/3/2012)
FYI, since some of you submit questions. I'm no longer accepting images of code.Please feel free to debate me.
A. I consider the QOD as a teaching exercise, and/or a test of past learning.
B. No more images makes the QOD a copy and paste exercise, for far too many people, who value the point more then they value what they could have learned.
C. Note how masses scream when they believe an answer is wrong. One reads nothing but "gimmie my points".
D. As if you did not have enough to do.. rewrite your original article on the QOD, omitting most of the history of how it evolved, but add emphasis that is is a LEARNING TOOL[/B], but errors may occur for we all are but human. And suck it up, no points will be awarded after the fact and yes who said life is fair, but that is the way it is and the way it wil be in the future
E. Add a new rule for submittal, if the author elects to use an image, and there is an error in the image of the code and that error negates what the author has said is the correct answer or answers, then the submitter will have not less than 100 points deducted from their over all total point score. Thus putting the burden of submitting a valid QOD on the back of the individual submitting the QOD for publication.
Anyone else care to join the debate ?
August 3, 2012 at 10:50 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/3/2012)
FYI, since some of you submit questions. I'm no longer accepting images of code.Please feel free to debate me.
First, I agree with A-D of what Ron said. (haven't thought E through enough to decide yet).
However: the only reason that I can see to NOT accept images is to make the QotD's easier to pre-validate the answers prior to publishing. If this is the plan (either by yourself or with a team), then I fully support this.
I know that Steve has had problems with such a group in the past... initially several enthusiastic folks, then it quickly dwindles to just a few. I'm looking for people that would seriously commit to this. But I also want to get enough folks that it doesn't become a burden on them. Reviewing 1 or 2 questions a month seems like a decent number for me.
(Steve: maybe on the question, put a "Question verified by ..."?)
I would commit to being on such a group. Any others?
Edit: Steve, I would not schedule any QotD for publication until it has been approved by the verifier. That way, things do not become pressure filled on the reviewer to get something done by a certain date.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
Viewing 15 posts - 37,276 through 37,290 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply