October 3, 2011 at 2:18 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
Hellocodevc.com is a code collection website and he collect best and true way in programming and IT
...
You know, the very first thing this person should post is:
DO NOT PLAGIARIZE ANY CONTENT!
There are several articles this person (you?) could reference that deal with plagiarism and how to properly react.
"true way in programming" and "plagiarize/steel whatever you can" are contradictory from my point of view.
October 3, 2011 at 2:21 pm
To say that codevc is sketchy is a gross understatement. They blatantly steal others work and repost it. They even have some of the stairways articles. http://codevc.com/1054_A_Stairway_to_Transaction_Log_Management_in_SQL_Server_Level_1_Transaction_Log_Overview.aspx
Maybe you can change your domain name to "plagairize.r.us". I have never seen such blatant disregard for other people's work.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 3, 2011 at 2:23 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
Hellocodevc.com is a code collection website and he collect best and true way in programming and IT
you see source link in bottom of page (I accept this is little - this is because site is in collecting now) and in some next day we add author and detail of source site
in addition :
you now in web thousands programming site and forum are live and users can't find true way in programming or other we find best Article and publish him with link of source site in article .
I hope you help us to do this.
And now spam :w00t: :doze:
October 3, 2011 at 2:24 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (10/3/2011)
The codevc one is harder. Someone has to track the registry down, hit the hoster up. Don't have time, but feel free to report him to the book publishers.
The whois info looks fake.
Domain Name: CODEVC.COM
Registrant:
None
farzia shirzad (h_parsoova@yahoo.com)
N/A
newyork
newyork,55555
US
Tel. +1.8885224222
Seeing if I can track the host down...
Host IP address: 174.142.105.2
Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM
Interesting list of other sites using the same name server http://www.who.is/nameserver/ns2.codevc.com/
Aprox geographical location of the server: Montreal, Canada (45.5 N, 73.58 W)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 2:32 pm
A who's who of who not to plagarize: Anyone published on SSC. Too many people willing to play detective!
Way to go SSC! You ROCK.
October 3, 2011 at 2:34 pm
WayneS (10/3/2011)
Roy Ernest (10/3/2011)
I do not have to worry about my stuff being stolen. No one in his right mind would want to do that... 😀I wouldn't say that... your articles are pretty good.
Some of my articles are there but they have linked it back to the original article in SSC. I do not know if they have permission from SSC but at least they link it back directly.
-Roy
October 3, 2011 at 2:48 pm
Roy Ernest (10/3/2011)
WayneS (10/3/2011)
Roy Ernest (10/3/2011)
I do not have to worry about my stuff being stolen. No one in his right mind would want to do that... 😀I wouldn't say that... your articles are pretty good.
Some of my articles are there but they have linked it back to the original article in SSC. I do not know if they have permission from SSC but at least they link it back directly.
It is your work, you still hold the copyright. If they didn't ask you for permission, it is a violation of copyright.
October 3, 2011 at 2:58 pm
SPAM OR Collect
this is two word with two means
1- If we stole or ... your data , I don't chat with you for this
2- I know different between stole and Collecting or every thing other , please show me link of legal term of spamming that say -- WHEN YOU MIRRORING SOME ARTICLE OF A SITE AND LINK HIM (DON'T LINK TO SITE ,LINK TO OWN PAGE IN SOURCE SITE) -- it's spamming , If you show me this , I delete this article you say
October 3, 2011 at 3:01 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
SPAM OR Collectthis is two word with two means
1- If we stole or ... your data , I don't chat with you for this
2- I know different between stole and Collecting or every thing other , please show me link of legal term of spamming that say -- WHEN YOU MIRRORING SOME ARTICLE OF A SITE AND LINK HIM (DON'T LINK TO SITE ,LINK TO OWN PAGE IN SOURCE SITE) -- it's spamming , If you show me this , I delete this article you say
Do you have my permission to reproduce my articles on your site? NO! That makes your collecting a violation of copyright.
October 3, 2011 at 3:04 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
SPAM OR Collectthis is two word with two means
1- If we stole or ... your data , I don't chat with you for this
2- I know different between stole and Collecting or every thing other , please show me link of legal term of spamming that say -- WHEN YOU MIRRORING SOME ARTICLE OF A SITE AND LINK HIM (DON'T LINK TO SITE ,LINK TO OWN PAGE IN SOURCE SITE) -- it's spamming , If you show me this , I delete this article you say
Better yet, do you have permission from every author of every article you have "collected" and posted on your site. If the answer is no (which it is in my case) you have an even bigger copyright problem on your hands.
October 3, 2011 at 3:06 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
SPAM OR Collectthis is two word with two means
1- If we stole or ... your data , I don't chat with you for this
2- I know different between stole and Collecting or every thing other , please show me link of legal term of spamming that say -- WHEN YOU MIRRORING SOME ARTICLE OF A SITE AND LINK HIM (DON'T LINK TO SITE ,LINK TO OWN PAGE IN SOURCE SITE) -- it's spamming , If you show me this , I delete this article you say
The mention of spamming was due to you repeating the purpose of your site.
Your site is not Mirroring. It is plagiarizing the work of others. Here is the definition http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism.
If this was legitimate you would make it obvious that the work is a collection and not your own. Your link would look something more like this: "Reposted by permission from ... "
As it is right now the link to the "source" is buried amid a bunch of links to other articles. If you wanted to do this above board you would create a bunch of links to other people's work and not host it on your own site. You would host a link to their work.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
October 3, 2011 at 3:08 pm
MR Lynn Pettis
you say this , Ok
1- please say me a legal link to this
2- then google or yahoo or other site that cache your data means they stole your data ?
October 3, 2011 at 3:10 pm
Lynn Pettis (10/3/2011)
Roy Ernest (10/3/2011)
WayneS (10/3/2011)
Roy Ernest (10/3/2011)
I do not have to worry about my stuff being stolen. No one in his right mind would want to do that... 😀I wouldn't say that... your articles are pretty good.
Some of my articles are there but they have linked it back to the original article in SSC. I do not know if they have permission from SSC but at least they link it back directly.
It is your work, you still hold the copyright. If they didn't ask you for permission, it is a violation of copyright.
Two thoughts:
1. If credit is given, it's not plagiarism.
2. If they don't have your permission, it is a copyright violation.
Now, if they were to use the first sentence and link back to your article for the rest, then I see that as okay.
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
October 3, 2011 at 3:10 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
2- I know different between stole and Collecting or every thing other , please show me link of legal term of spamming that say -- WHEN YOU MIRRORING SOME ARTICLE OF A SITE AND LINK HIM (DON'T LINK TO SITE ,LINK TO OWN PAGE IN SOURCE SITE) -- it's spamming , If you show me this , I delete this article you say
No, spamming is what you're doing on this thread. Stealing (copyright violation) is what you're doing by 'collecting' people's work.
Can you copy the news from the New York Times and post it on your site? Can you copy a book from a library and post it on your site? Same goes for other people's work. If you want to reproduce copyrighted information, you must get the original author's permission. Simple legal rules (feel free to ask a lawyer).
See:
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copyright.html
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html
Also:
http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/06/more-thoughts-on-blog-plagiarism/
http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blog-plagiarism-qa/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 3, 2011 at 3:12 pm
parsayandan (10/3/2011)
MR Lynn Pettisyou say this , Ok
1- please say me a legal link to this
2- then google or yahoo or other site that cache your data means they stole your data ?
Search engines aren't trying to present my work as their own. Looking at your site it is not obvious that I am the original author of the work, your link to the original work is buried and ambiguous. And most importantly, you DO NOT have my permission to republish my work on your site.
Viewing 15 posts - 30,556 through 30,570 (of 66,749 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply