March 19, 2009 at 1:04 pm
twitter tweeter tweeps tweeple twen twimes twoday
Leftover green beer?
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
March 19, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Arrogance, it seems, returned it has. Oh well, much hope I have no longer.
March 19, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Bob Hovious (3/19/2009)
What I know of chaos theory leads me to disbelieve the concept of "Temporal Inertia", although conversely it leads me to believe more strongly in Santa Clause.
[font="Verdana"]Snort![/font]
March 19, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Snort!
No thanks, Bruce. Cocaine makes me crazy. 😎
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
March 19, 2009 at 1:49 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/19/2009)
Arrogance, it seems, returned it has. Oh well, much hope I have no longer.
Arrogance has returned? In Rant you mean?
-Roy
March 19, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Arrogance, it seems, returned it has. Oh well, much hope I have no longer.
Is it possible he's been doing it all with cursors since 1995 ??
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
March 19, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Bob Hovious (3/19/2009)
Arrogance, it seems, returned it has. Oh well, much hope I have no longer.
Is it possible he's been doing it all with cursors since 1995 ??
Suprise me it would not. Strong is the Dark Side. The Emperor it seems he still may be.
(Sorry, had to go back to the metaphor that works! 😛 )
March 19, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Whoa! I think we had an epiphany!!! From The Rant:
foxjazz (3/19/2009)
Lynn, you have completely and utterly convinced me to look for a set based solution to the problems that come as part of the job.Cudos for that!
March 19, 2009 at 2:06 pm
March 19, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Luke L (3/19/2009)
'course it did take 3 movies to turn Vader from the Dark Side, so I suppose you can't expect it to happen overnight.-Luke.
It only took six to turn him from a semi-spoiled, annoying brat into a dead good-guy, with much of the transformation being spent in the "teen angst raised to melodrama poorly" stage. Though I do have to admit, all of that might be worth it for a chance at Natalie Portman....
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
March 19, 2009 at 2:23 pm
GSquared (3/19/2009)
It only took six to turn him from a semi-spoiled, annoying brat into a dead good-guy, with much of the transformation being spent in the "teen angst raised to melodrama poorly" stage. Though I do have to admit, all of that might be worth it for a chance at Natalie Portman....
Yeah I'm thinking it probably was.
March 19, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Luke L (3/19/2009)
GSquared (3/19/2009)
It only took six to turn him from a semi-spoiled, annoying brat into a dead good-guy, with much of the transformation being spent in the "teen angst raised to melodrama poorly" stage. Though I do have to admit, all of that might be worth it for a chance at Natalie Portman....Yeah I'm thinking it probably was.
Okay boys, Yes I agree, but I think we should all get back to work...
March 19, 2009 at 2:29 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/19/2009)
Arrogance, it seems, returned it has. Oh well, much hope I have no longer.
Patience. Most of us have too much pride to swallow it all at once.
And if we try, much of it will just come back up shortly. 😛
[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung[font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]
March 19, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Bob Hovious (3/19/2009)
No thanks, Bruce. Cocaine makes me crazy. 😎
[font="Verdana"]Yeah, not one of Eric's better moments.[/font]
March 19, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/19/2009)
Whoa! I think we had an epiphany!!! From The Rant:foxjazz (3/19/2009)
Lynn, you have completely and utterly convinced me to look for a set based solution to the problems that come as part of the job.Cudos for that!
That sounds like the best we could expect.
foxjazz (3/19/2009)
I have had extensive experience with set based queries in the past, and currently. Having experience with sql server since 1995, table locking and such things and multi-user server is not new to me at all. Although sometimes I struggle with certain concepts that I have infrequently used, (sub queries) for one. I have rarely had the need to use them.
His experience seems only to have extended as far doing simple queries, inserts and updates, probably from C# applications. I suspect he hasn't written many views, procedures, triggers, etc if he hasn't need to use subqueries! I rarely write a query that doesn't have a subquery! 😀
Reading the brief descriptions of parts of foxjazz's system, it sounds like it was incompletely specified at the start and has 'evolved' (like a lot of systems do!). Some features have obviously been proposed but not properly thought out, then signed off and hence had to be implemented in inefficient ways ("'cos that's what the CEO/MD/Chairman wants!"). An example is the use of 'bands' for part numbers which depend on the source; much better to assign the part numbers completely sequentially and add a source prefix.
Anyway, while I'm willing to offer some 'keyhole' fixes, I don't want to argue over a redesign of someone else's system (especially as they aren't paying me!), so I'm going to sit down on the sidelines for now and watch how long the 'Rant' goes on.
Derek
Viewing 15 posts - 2,806 through 2,820 (of 66,738 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply