October 7, 2010 at 2:25 pm
Roy Ernest (10/7/2010)
Anybody looking for chairs or recliners?How do we report spam?
How to report spam? Yell as loud as you can: "STEVE!!!!!" π
Click the Report button in the upper right hand corner of the post.
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
October 7, 2010 at 2:27 pm
Just hit report, and then submit it. No need to add comments. I'll figure it out.
October 7, 2010 at 2:32 pm
Alvin Ramard (10/7/2010)
I thought the next version of SQL was going to be 2011.
Not necessarily. No release date or name has been announced. The reason people have been referring to the next major version of SQL as SQL 11 is because @@version on SQL 2008 returns 10.0.xxxx. Hence, the logical deduction is that for the next major version, @@version will return 11.0.xxxx, hence calling it SQL 11 (and the one after SQL 12)
SQL 2008 R2 returns 10.5.xxxx
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
October 7, 2010 at 4:03 pm
I just had an idea for an epic summer movie. It involves an intrepid group of DBA's and SQL Developers who get sent back to prehistoric times by a typo in the DBCC TIMEWARP parms.
Working title: "One Million Posts, B.C."
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
October 7, 2010 at 4:12 pm
GilaMonster (10/7/2010)
Alvin Ramard (10/7/2010)
I thought the next version of SQL was going to be 2011.Not necessarily. No release date or name has been announced. The reason people have been referring to the next major version of SQL as SQL 11 is because @@version on SQL 2008 returns 10.0.xxxx. Hence, the logical deduction is that for the next major version, @@version will return 11.0.xxxx, hence calling it SQL 11 (and the one after SQL 12)
SQL 2008 R2 returns 10.5.xxxx
And in the registry it'll be 110
--------------------------------------
When you encounter a problem, if the solution isn't readily evident go back to the start and check your assumptions.
--------------------------------------
Itβs unpleasantly like being drunk.
Whatβs so unpleasant about being drunk?
You ask a glass of water. -- Douglas Adams
October 7, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Alvin Ramard (10/7/2010)
I thought the next version of SQL was going to be 2011.
That appears to be the current plan:
The Microsoft comments refer to it as SQL11 with a planned release of 2011.
October 8, 2010 at 2:14 am
GilaMonster (10/7/2010)
Alvin Ramard (10/7/2010)
I thought the next version of SQL was going to be 2011.Not necessarily. No release date or name has been announced. The reason people have been referring to the next major version of SQL as SQL 11 is because @@version on SQL 2008 returns 10.0.xxxx. Hence, the logical deduction is that for the next major version, @@version will return 11.0.xxxx, hence calling it SQL 11 (and the one after SQL 12)
SQL 2008 R2 returns 10.5.xxxx
Awww first thing in the morning at work, open up SSC and here's a Thread post from Gail all full of kisses. Made my day. Bless! π
For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
October 8, 2010 at 2:43 am
WayneS (10/7/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/7/2010)
GilaMonster (10/7/2010)
This has got to take some form of prize. http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1000227.aspxTime to get the crystal ball out again.
Apparently it's my turn to feel snippy. I couldn't resist.
IMO, it wasn't snippy at all. In fact, I might have sent them a lmgtfy link, instead of just suggesting google.
It's always a good idea to actually try Google first before making such a recommendation because there's nothing on this one.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:50 am
Roy Ernest (10/7/2010)
Anybody looking for chairs or recliners?How do we report spam?
Hit the [Report] button instead of the [Quote] button and leave a quick note "Looks like spam".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 2:55 am
The Dixie Flatline (10/7/2010)
I just had an idea for an epic summer movie. It involves an intrepid group of DBA's and SQL Developers who get sent back to prehistoric times by a typo in the DBCC TIMEWARP parms.Working title: "One Million Posts, B.C."
Heh... that's too funny. We'll have Steve in his kilt and Hawaiian shirt as a stand in for Raquel. Grant can play the part of the dinosaur. π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2010 at 5:16 am
Jeff Moden (10/8/2010)
WayneS (10/7/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/7/2010)
GilaMonster (10/7/2010)
This has got to take some form of prize. http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1000227.aspxTime to get the crystal ball out again.
Apparently it's my turn to feel snippy. I couldn't resist.
IMO, it wasn't snippy at all. In fact, I might have sent them a lmgtfy link, instead of just suggesting google.
It's always a good idea to actually try Google first before making such a recommendation because there's nothing on this one.
No. I did that on purpose because I knew he'd either find too many posts or none at all. Hence my "when you're confused, refer to the below posts" comment.
October 8, 2010 at 5:17 am
Jeff Moden (10/8/2010)
The Dixie Flatline (10/7/2010)
I just had an idea for an epic summer movie. It involves an intrepid group of DBA's and SQL Developers who get sent back to prehistoric times by a typo in the DBCC TIMEWARP parms.Working title: "One Million Posts, B.C."
Heh... that's too funny. We'll have Steve in his kilt and Hawaiian shirt as a stand in for Raquel. Grant can play the part of the dinosaur. π
Oh, my. Don't tempt me...
...too late. Who wants to be in the cast list?
October 8, 2010 at 6:08 am
Jeff Moden (10/8/2010)
The Dixie Flatline (10/7/2010)
I just had an idea for an epic summer movie. It involves an intrepid group of DBA's and SQL Developers who get sent back to prehistoric times by a typo in the DBCC TIMEWARP parms.Working title: "One Million Posts, B.C."
Heh... that's too funny. We'll have Steve in his kilt and Hawaiian shirt as a stand in for Raquel. Grant can play the part of the dinosaur. π
Any stand-in for Raquel, male, female or other, must wear a fuzzy bikini. There are no other options.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
October 8, 2010 at 7:19 am
Grant Fritchey (10/8/2010)
Any stand-in for Raquel, male, female or other, must wear a fuzzy bikini. There are no other options.
What an image to start off Friday with...
-- Kit
October 8, 2010 at 7:23 am
Jeff Moden (10/8/2010)
The Dixie Flatline (10/7/2010)
I just had an idea for an epic summer movie. It involves an intrepid group of DBA's and SQL Developers who get sent back to prehistoric times by a typo in the DBCC TIMEWARP parms.Working title: "One Million Posts, B.C."
Heh... that's too funny. We'll have Steve in his kilt and Hawaiian shirt as a stand in for Raquel. Grant can play the part of the dinosaur. π
Wa... wa... wa... wait!!! If Steve's gonna standin for Raquel, I'm gonna use DBCC TimeWarp to erase this idea!!! :w00t:
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
Viewing 15 posts - 20,146 through 20,160 (of 66,738 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply