June 3, 2010 at 4:43 am
Richard Gardner-291039 (6/3/2010)
I personally find the following entirely helpful when faced with stupid questions (although I'm possibly guilty of it myself at times)http://lmgtfy.com/?q=SQL+Server+2005+Delete+Query+Syntax
Stupid Question #345: Why can't I get the hyperlink syntax to work properly π
Does this help? π
For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
June 3, 2010 at 4:51 am
Well I'm glad that's sorted out π
June 3, 2010 at 5:31 am
CirquedeSQLeil (6/2/2010)
Sounds like a conversation I had recently.Me: Why are we doing it that way?
other: Because it is being done this way.
Me: Why can't we do it this way?
other: Because we are doing it this way.
I'd like to hear that occasionally. I'm constantly barraged with "We've been doing it this way for 10 years..."
Like doing something stupid for a long time makes it smart.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 3, 2010 at 7:29 am
Grant Fritchey (6/3/2010)
I'd like to hear that occasionally. I'm constantly barraged with "We've been doing it this way for 10 years..."Like doing something stupid for a long time makes it smart.
Or... we've been using cursors for 10 years 'cause there wasn't any other way to do it.
Maybe then, but now?
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
June 3, 2010 at 9:51 am
It's always a balance, right? Sometimes the old ways work well and changing for the sake of change isn't worth it. Sometimes you need to move on.
It's a question of understanding when it's worth changing.
June 3, 2010 at 9:53 am
True, but it's not until you try and change something you find out which is which....
June 3, 2010 at 10:41 am
Steve Jones - Editor (6/3/2010)
It's always a balance, right? Sometimes the old ways work well and changing for the sake of change isn't worth it. Sometimes you need to move on.It's a question of understanding when it's worth changing.
Agreed. I don't typically propose change unless the process is really bad, slow or causes problems (and occasionally I will tinker with something that seems slow and see if I can make it go faster - even if it is just a nominal gain).
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 3, 2010 at 11:03 am
Steve Jones - Editor (6/3/2010)
It's always a balance, right? Sometimes the old ways work well and changing for the sake of change isn't worth it. Sometimes you need to move on.It's a question of understanding when it's worth changing.
Yes but, let's face it, if something was good, useful and smart, the answer to why you should continue doing this good/useful/smart thing would not be "We've been doing it for 10 years." You might be able to suggest reasons why it was good/useful/smart, not simply old.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 3, 2010 at 11:26 am
Grant Fritchey (6/3/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (6/3/2010)
It's always a balance, right? Sometimes the old ways work well and changing for the sake of change isn't worth it. Sometimes you need to move on.It's a question of understanding when it's worth changing.
Yes but, let's face it, if something was good, useful and smart, the answer to why you should continue doing this good/useful/smart thing would not be "We've been doing it for 10 years." You might be able to suggest reasons why it was good/useful/smart, not simply old.
If it was good enough for Grams, then it should be good enough for me - right?
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 3, 2010 at 12:00 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (6/3/2010)
If it was good enough for Grams, then it should be good enough for me - right?
Who, Gramps - that sly old dog?? π
-- You can't be late until you show up.
June 3, 2010 at 12:16 pm
I agree, if you want to defend your decisions, you need reasons. I'll say I've defended a practice multiple times to new people, and eventually started telling people that "we do it because" and telling them to watch for a bit, learn what we've done, and then offer suggestions.
June 3, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
There are quite a few people here with Oracle skills, including Jeff. I'm not sure Jeff wants to help with Oracle, but worth a try.
I help people a lot with Oracle... I suggest they migrate to SQL Server. π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2010 at 3:25 pm
Jeff Moden (6/3/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
There are quite a few people here with Oracle skills, including Jeff. I'm not sure Jeff wants to help with Oracle, but worth a try.I help people a lot with Oracle... I suggest they migrate to SQL Server. π
WooW what a big help - :hehe::cool::w00t:;-):-D
June 3, 2010 at 4:03 pm
Jeff Moden (6/3/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
There are quite a few people here with Oracle skills, including Jeff. I'm not sure Jeff wants to help with Oracle, but worth a try.I help people a lot with Oracle... I suggest they migrate to SQL Server. π
I expect no other help from you, Jeff. :hehe:
June 3, 2010 at 4:36 pm
Jeff Moden (6/3/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
There are quite a few people here with Oracle skills, including Jeff. I'm not sure Jeff wants to help with Oracle, but worth a try.I help people a lot with Oracle... I suggest they migrate to SQL Server. π
Seems like good advice to me. And for this, they pay you $250/hr?
Wayne
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008
Author - SQL Server T-SQL Recipes
Viewing 15 posts - 15,631 through 15,645 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply