June 2, 2010 at 11:59 am
GilaMonster (6/2/2010)
What a waste of good sarcasm...http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic930338-1291-1.aspx
Breaking my Thread-free streak...
At least his current icon is appropriate.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
June 2, 2010 at 12:12 pm
GilaMonster (6/2/2010)
What a waste of good sarcasm...http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic930338-1291-1.aspx
You could see it as the perfect dead-pan response 😉
I don't think that's the case here since 'The Leader' long since made my blacklist - he hasn't the wit.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
June 2, 2010 at 12:29 pm
Paul White NZ (6/2/2010)
You could see it as the perfect dead-pan response 😉
I could, but....
That thread also needs an award for the number of sheer useless answers. Seriously, 2 people now have offered a query with hardcoded dates in it. WTH?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 2, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
And here I thought cat litter was a clustering agent. :w00t:
Careful there. A water cooler is a clustering agent - that's why we cluster here.
I hope you weren't likening the thread to cat litter. :w00t:
Tom
June 2, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Hmm, this thread like cat litter....maybe I can get an analogy there.
Actually this thread provides me with alternating periods of confusion, information, and entertainment.
June 2, 2010 at 1:42 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (6/1/2010)
Very cool video. Worth watching:
It's right of course, but it isn't new at all. It's been knbown for decades. One snag is that you have to pay enough to make money (and some other things) not an issue before you think about the real motivators (in the terminology of half a century ago, cover hygiene factors before motivation), but that's minor compared to the big problem: despite all the evidence most senior managers just don't believe it (they consider scientific evidence as something that is seditious if it contradicts their ideological convictions about the profit motive).
Tom
June 2, 2010 at 2:03 pm
Paul White NZ (6/2/2010)
... 'The Leader' ...
of the Thread, vroom vroom.
Couldn't resist - song popped in my head.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 2, 2010 at 2:05 pm
GilaMonster (6/2/2010)
Paul White NZ (6/2/2010)
You could see it as the perfect dead-pan response 😉I could, but....
That thread also needs an award for the number of sheer useless answers. Seriously, 2 people now have offered a query with hardcoded dates in it. WTH?
Better yet is that one of the hard coded dates came after the lecture by Jeff.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 2, 2010 at 4:49 pm
Poster: I downloaded a script and it doesn't work. I made a change and have this error "Must declare variable @SomeRandomVar"
Me: It's a syntax error. You must have typo'd a name.
Poster: But I just downloaded the script and added a variable.
Me: (pause, deep breath, bang head on desk once)
Me: It's a syntax error
June 2, 2010 at 4:59 pm
Sounds like a conversation I had recently.
Me: Why are we doing it that way?
other: Because it is being done this way.
Me: Why can't we do it this way?
other: Because we are doing it this way.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
June 2, 2010 at 8:18 pm
GilaMonster (6/2/2010)
Paul White NZ (6/2/2010)
You could see it as the perfect dead-pan response 😉I could, but....
That thread also needs an award for the number of sheer useless answers. Seriously, 2 people now have offered a query with hardcoded dates in it. WTH?
I honestly wasn't sure what was going on after that first one. 1/1/82 - 12/31/06? huh? where did that date range come from? lol
But, love the suggested solution, the disclaimer (which should be a joke by itself after that solution) and the fact that he actually TRIED it.
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
June 2, 2010 at 8:20 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (6/2/2010)
Paul White NZ (6/2/2010)
... 'The Leader' ...of the Thread, vroom vroom.
Couldn't resist - song popped in my head.
Damn you! I grew up only allowed to listen to classical music and oldies. The horror...
At least he dies in that one...:hehe::cool:
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
June 2, 2010 at 8:21 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (6/2/2010)
Sounds like a conversation I had recently.Me: Why are we doing it that way?
other: Because it is being done this way.
Me: Why can't we do it this way?
other: Because we are doing it this way.
I didn't realize we worked together, we should do lunch sometime...
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question[/url]
How to post performance problems[/url]
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop[/url]
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
June 3, 2010 at 4:24 am
I personally find the following entirely helpful when faced with stupid questions (although I'm possibly guilty of it myself at times)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=SQL+Server+2005+Delete+Query+Syntax
Stupid Question #345: Why can't I get the hyperlink syntax to work properly 😉
June 3, 2010 at 4:40 am
Richard Gardner-291039 (6/3/2010)
Stupid Question #345: Why can't I get the hyperlink syntax to work properly 😉
I just use the Insert Hyperlink option and add the address there. Then I put something suitably 'innocent' before the closing tag of the url marker as below (I've substituted < and > for [] to illustrate:
'<url=www.brokenlink.com >Innocent phrase</url>'
Viewing 15 posts - 15,616 through 15,630 (of 66,712 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply