June 28, 2014 at 12:30 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Application Developers don’t own their data
Best wishes,
Phil Factor
June 28, 2014 at 7:46 pm
I wouldn't take "my" data to mean at the exclusion of others. It is a declaration of ownership, but usually in the context of taking responsibility for the data. That is a good trait for a developer to have and is much better than saying, "It's not my fault." or "That's not my job." Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.
June 29, 2014 at 11:49 am
Jeff Oresik (6/28/2014)
I wouldn't take "my" data to mean at the exclusion of others. It is a declaration of ownership, but usually in the context of taking responsibility for the data. That is a good trait for a developer to have and is much better than saying, "It's not my fault." or "That's not my job." Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.
I agree. That's generally how I've used the term owned and generally how I've heard it used.
However, there are certainly those who 'own' data or an application and don't want anyone else touching it even when there are legitimate reasons.
And I have to admit that I have sometimes had to fight that tendancy in myself.
June 29, 2014 at 6:56 pm
marcia.j.wilson (6/29/2014)
Jeff Oresik (6/28/2014)
I wouldn't take "my" data to mean at the exclusion of others. It is a declaration of ownership, but usually in the context of taking responsibility for the data. That is a good trait for a developer to have and is much better than saying, "It's not my fault." or "That's not my job." Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.I agree. That's generally how I've used the term owned and generally how I've heard it used.
However, there are certainly those who 'own' data or an application and don't want anyone else touching it even when there are legitimate reasons.
And I have to admit that I have sometimes had to fight that tendancy in myself.
We internally have been having a lot of discourse around this concept of ownership. I think Phil's usage of custodianship rather than ownership makes sense from a dev or DBA point of view: we're responsible for making sure that the data is accurate and available. However our sphere of influence stops before it comes to deciding how long we hold onto that data, which is where the "true" owner needs to step in (the business stakeholders).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?
June 29, 2014 at 7:27 pm
You can often tell who owns data by asking who has the right to delete it.
June 30, 2014 at 3:03 am
As someone coming from the developers' side of the fence, with regards to the attitude of ownership of the data then developers (where there is a DBA function) do not own but are in part responsible for the data. This sits alongside a lot of other peoples' responsibility for the integrity of the data e.g. data entry teams.
I have talked about the data "being mine" against a DBA when in a development environment (where the developers define the database structure and develop the stored procedures) where a database has been assigned for the sole use of the development team (which may include a DB Developer) and a DBA external to the team has altered the schema in some way or removed or altered the data.
Gaz
-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!
July 9, 2014 at 7:57 am
Hi Phil,
I seek your help on this.....
Please help me on this.
I have 3 tables
Table A:- Driver Table
CAT Code, Parttype, BasePartNo, LikePartNo
MCN, FLOORMAT, MCNW10, MCNW10**
MCN, FLRLNR, MCN444410, MCN4*4410
Table B:- Build Table
CAT Code, Parttype, BasePartNo, LikePartNo1, LikePartNo2... LikePartNo50
MCN, FLOORMAT, MCNW10, MCNW10TN, MCNW10GR,-,-
MCN, FLRLNR, MCN444410, MCN454410, MCN464410,-,-
Table C:-
Application Table
make, model, year, remarks , part#, remarks2, footnote_list
58, 747, 2003, L; Automatic Trans, MCNW10TN, 2.0L, E009
58, 747, 2002, Base; Automatic Trans, MCNW10TN, 2.0L, E009
Requirement is like this:- Retrieve Application field like make,model as in application table for Basepart and Like Part Nos.
Run comparison between basepart and like part No in application table and build Report which must contain if any mismatch In make model etc..
i.e make model,remarks.. etc for basepart is not equal to the make, model, remarks etc... for likepartnos
Attribute means: make,model,year etc.. make model year,Model,part#,application#,remarks2,remarks3
for eg:-
likepart Attributes--
63,6853,2010,Silverado1500,MCNW10GR,5155634,5.7L,Rear
likepart Attributes
63,6853,2011,Silverado1500, MCNW10TN,5155640,5.3L,back
BasePart Attribute
63,6853, 2010, Silverado1500,MCNW10,5155640, 5.3L, Rear
Here attributes for base part is correct and act as a reference, and if likepart contain other attributes it should appear in result.
Result
63,6853,2010,Silverado1500, MCNW10GR, 5155634,5.7L, Rear
63,6853,2011,Silverado1500, MCNW10TN, 5155640,5.3L, back
Make, model,year,remarks.... etc for base part number need to compare it with Make, model,year,remarks.... etc for likepartnumber in application table.
here application table contain the part which is present in either likepartnumber1,likepartnumber2... likepartnumber50 of Build Table
so the comparison is need to be done with application data like make,model.. etc for base partnumber
to the application data like make,model.. etc for likepartnumber in application table
Thanks a ton.... 🙂
July 10, 2014 at 12:55 am
Agreed - I.T. departments rarely own data, they may protect it, manipulate it, distribute it and so on, but they don't own it. Other departments own it, it is however, from my experience, is IT's responsibility to fix when "it's not right" :angry:
-------------------------------Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden [/url]Smart way to ask a question
There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand (the world). There is no such thing as a dumb question. ― Carl Sagan
I would never join a club that would allow me as a member - Groucho Marx
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply