February 17, 2009 at 7:29 am
We're on Sql Server 2005 at the minute, and I've been tasked with doing a bit of research into whether to upgrade to 2008, or whether it would be worth waiting till 2010.
As I understand it, Sql Server 2010 is not going to have any database engine changes, but will have some BI additions. These additions I can't see as being of particular interest to us, so my thoughts at the moment would be to switch to 2008 and await the post-2010 major release.
I think management are trying to avoid going through any upgrade whatsoever, and was wondering what the word on the street was regarding future major releases (2012 maybe?). I haven't had much joy with Google, but most likely I'm not searching for the right terms.
Thanks
February 17, 2009 at 7:51 am
There's been no official announcement beyond the BI upgrades, so far as I am aware. However, the updates such as Policy Management are certainly worth the upgrade now.
K. Brian Kelley
@kbriankelley
February 17, 2009 at 8:01 am
K. Brian Kelley (2/17/2009)
There's been no official announcement beyond the BI upgrades, so far as I am aware. However, the updates such as Policy Management are certainly worth the upgrade now.
Thank you, Policy Management will turn out to be a big tool in my arsenal to try and convince management to upgrade from Sql2005 to 2008
February 17, 2009 at 8:09 am
I believe the next planned major release is 2011, but you know how it goes with Microsoft and the release dates. They made an announcement a while back to expect a major release every 3 years, so 2005 ... 2008 ... 2011.
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
February 17, 2009 at 8:13 am
Thanks Alvin
I got the impression that they were talking of release timescales more in line with 36 months, hence why I thought 2008 -> 2010 (factoring in the Microsoft delay factor!) --> 2012 (not necessarily major releases)
3 years makes more sense (but 2011 is quite a way away nonetheless!)
February 17, 2009 at 11:04 am
It's irrelevant
but I am just happy if they can call 2008 Enterprise edition the next SQL Server 2011 I'd be happy enough
I care about the features, not so much the version/year in the name 🙂
I want compression (backup and row/page) and some Enterprise features
not another new version with features that I can't use 😀
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply