September 11, 2012 at 10:01 am
Nice question Ravi. Learned something new today. Thanks!
September 11, 2012 at 10:23 am
Good one. Thanks 😎
September 11, 2012 at 12:45 pm
September 11, 2012 at 3:56 pm
SQL Kiwi (9/11/2012)
The question didn't mention trace flag 610 (which would enable minimal-logging in this scenario) so I assumed it was off, and was rewarded with a green tick and a point.http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd425070.aspx (Summarizing Minimal Logging Conditions)
+1
I like it when you bring more to the table like that little tidbit.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
September 13, 2012 at 4:20 am
Sorry, guys, I've been trying to resist, but finally had to say it.
OMG, I *learned* something. That's horrible! I want my points back!
😀
(Brandie runs and hides now)
September 13, 2012 at 9:04 am
sestell1 (9/11/2012)
Great question Ravi, thanks!Interesting note about traceflag 610 SQL Kiwi, I was not familiar with that traceflag.
Here is some more information on it:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd425070(v=sql.100).aspx
EDIT - fixed a typo
+1
Kenneth FisherI was once offered a wizards hat but it got in the way of my dunce cap.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/[/url]For better answers on performance questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/[/url]Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLStudies.com[/url]
September 15, 2012 at 4:53 am
Good question.
SQL Kiwi (9/11/2012)
The question didn't mention trace flag 610 (which would enable minimal-logging in this scenario) so I assumed it was off, and was rewarded with a green tick and a point.http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd425070.aspx (Summarizing Minimal Logging Conditions)
I was tempted to just say "false" because if it were "true" everybody who hadn't a clue would have got it right, but we do have some questions where the "obvious" answer is actually the "correct" answer so I thought I should look it up to make sure; What I found confirmed that "false" was the right answer, and then when I came here I saw Paul's comment and discovered that I had still more reading to do.
Thanks Ravi for the learning experience, and Paul for compounding it.
I think you would get the same result ("false") if that flag (610) was on, provided all the new records fitted into existing pages, or the table was being replicated.
Tom
September 15, 2012 at 11:42 am
SQL Kiwi (9/11/2012)
The question didn't mention trace flag 610 (which would enable minimal-logging in this scenario) so I assumed it was off, and was rewarded with a green tick and a point.http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd425070.aspx (Summarizing Minimal Logging Conditions)
Yes Paul, there is a lot to understand about minimally logging in SQL Server. Setting the recovery model to Bulk-logged will not only make the transactions logged minimally.
Thank you for providing us this link.
Regards,
Ravi.
October 17, 2012 at 9:00 am
Nice question.I got it correct.
Malleswarareddy
I.T.Analyst
MCITP(70-451)
December 21, 2012 at 4:51 am
I choose right answer .... but what does it means 'minimal logging' ?
just a bit tricky in my own opinion
thanks
Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 24 (of 24 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply