July 15, 2012 at 4:33 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item A Cool Job
July 20, 2012 at 6:01 am
Did anyone notice that they mentioned a Raid 5 array and described RAID 10 or 1+0?
What is wrong with fact checking articles these days? I checked the server specs online and sure enough it is RAID 10 and not in any way described as RAID 5 except in this article...
July 20, 2012 at 8:15 am
I'm sure that's a typo. Probably the author is used to typing raid 5 and copy writers didn't realize. RAID is mentioned a number of times, and it says TPC-E requires R1 or R5. Not sure about R10.
It is annoying, to a tech person to read this.
July 20, 2012 at 8:57 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/20/2012)
I'm sure that's a typo. Probably the author is used to typing raid 5 and copy writers didn't realize. RAID is mentioned a number of times, and it says TPC-E requires R1 or R5. Not sure about R10.It is annoying, to a tech person to read this.
These are less annoying to read.
http://www.tpc.org/tpce/results/tpce_perf_results.asp
http://unisys.com/unisys/news/detail.jsp?id=16100006&pid=&sid=203
http://unisys.com/unisys/ri/wp/detail.jsp?id=1120000970014810164&pid=&sid=4100008
This last one is to the download link for the server model used in the TPC-E test. It shows that all storage configurations are RAID1+0. I have not seen RAID 5 on any part of a performance system in years.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy