2004 Readers Choice Awards Results
-
Comments posted to this topic are about the content posted at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columni
-
First of all I would like to say congratulations to the winners.
I must admit though that I find it strange that products that are less than complete and have numerous faults and don't do what they say they do - win.
I think this survey shows that the best may or may not be the winner, the one with the most money behind it will win.
Kind of reminds me of the American presidency campaigns.
regards,
Mark Baekdal
+44 (0)208 241 1762
Living and breathing database change management for SQL Server
-
Are the products considered (or nominated) for each category and the number of votes each actually recevied listed anywhere? I would consider that very useful information...
Philip
-
I'd kind of like to know why readers chose the products that they chose. It gives a lot of weight to making decisions when we can see what percentage of votes each product got and any reasons that were given for choosing that product over a competitor. It would also help to see what options were available when the votes were cast.
-
I agree with Mark above. Methinks one of the vendors has found a way to circumvent the can’t-vote-more-than-once-from-the-same-machine governor and therefore “automagically” votes itself into first place…
-
Can anyone tell me where I have to go to find the results of the 2003 or 2004 Readers Choice Awards Results for Medford, Massachusetts?
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply