Post reply

2000 and 2005 on same server

  • April 24, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    #178041

    What is the best practice or requirements to have an instance of SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 on same server. Does 2000 have to be a default instance?  Can it be a named instance?

     

    Thanks for Info

    Steve

  • April 24, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    #702284

    We've recently installed a named instance of SQL 2005 on a server that already had a SQL 2000 default instance and we haven't had any major problems.  Neither version has to be a default instance.  You can install both as named instances if you want.

    Greg

    Greg

  • April 25, 2007 at 3:57 am

    #702320

    I have recently installed 2000 as a named instance on a box with 2005 as default.  Seems to be ok.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply