Administration

External Article

Making a more reliable and flexible sp_MSforeachdb

  • Article

While the system procedure sp_MSforeachdb is neither documented nor officially supported, most SQL Server professionals have used it at one time or another. This is typically for ad hoc maintenance tasks, but many people (myself included) have used this type of looping activity in permanent routines. Sadly, I have discovered instances where, under heavy load and/or with a large number of databases, the procedure can actually skip multiple catalogs with no error or warning message. Since this situation is not easily reproducible, and since Microsoft typically has no interest in fixing unsupported objects, this may be happening in your environment right now

2011-01-18

3,580 reads

Blogs

T-SQL Tuesday #192: What career risks have you taken?

By

I’m honored to be hosting T-SQL Tuesday — edition #192. For those who may...

AI: Blog a Day – Day 3: LLM Models – Open Source vs Closed Source

By

Continuing from Day 2 , we learned introduction on Generative AI and Agentic AI,...

How to Parameterize Fabric Linked Services in Azure Data Factory for Azure Devops Deployment

By

Quite the title, so let me set the stage first. You have an Azure...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

A Quick Restore

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item A Quick Restore

Guarding Against SQL Injection at the Database Layer (SQL Server)

By Terry Jago

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Guarding Against SQL Injection at...

Ola Hallengren Index Optimize Maintenance can we have data compression = page

By JSB_89

I have a quick question on Ola Hallengren Index Optimize Maintenance . Do we...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

A Quick Restore

While doing some testing of an application, I wanted to reset my environment after doing some testing with this code:

USE DNRTest

BACKUP DATABASE DNRTest TO DISK = 'dnrtest.bak'
GO
/*
Bunch of stuff tested here
*/RESTORE DATABASE DNRTest FROM DISK = 'dnrtest.bak' WITH REPLACE
What happens if this runs, assuming the "bunch of stuff" isn't anything affecting the instance.

See possible answers