July 2, 2017 at 12:10 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Disabled Schedules
July 2, 2017 at 12:11 am
Nice easy one to start the week thanks Steve, perhaps a little close to the previous one though?
...
July 2, 2017 at 12:26 pm
Oh got it wrong but good question!
Is it odd that it says the QOTD was posted on 08/06/2017?
Should it now have today's date?
Robin
July 3, 2017 at 1:27 am
Tiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.
July 3, 2017 at 1:35 am
Nice, easy question to start the week on, thanks Steve
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
July 3, 2017 at 1:48 am
A most unsurprising answer. Two options were effectively identical - so both had to be wrong. Another one sounded somewhat far-fetched. So, only the simplest - and correct - option remained.
July 3, 2017 at 7:45 am
Today's question is strikingly similar to the 6/27/2017 question.
The good news is the the percentage of correct answers on today's question is higher than on the 6/27 question. We're learning! <Smile>
July 3, 2017 at 8:22 am
robinwilson - Sunday, July 2, 2017 12:26 PMOh got it wrong but good question!Is it odd that it says the QOTD was posted on 08/06/2017?
Should it now have today's date?Robin
You've mis-translated the date. This is June 8, 2017.
July 3, 2017 at 8:23 am
Mighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AMTiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.
That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.
July 3, 2017 at 8:32 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AMMighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AMTiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.
we can go on into a copious amount of detail about everything that can start a job, irrespective of the job's own schedule, e.g. another job or a stored procedure or a process on another server, to name but a few.
However, that is not what this question is asking.
This question can (and should) be answered correctly by anyone with some DBA experience.
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
July 4, 2017 at 3:49 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AMMighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AMTiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.
I agree that a manual start isn't a trigger.
But the explanation is still a bit inaccurate, since a trigger can call sp_start_job. I have used that in error management, so it's not something obscure that no-one ever does. Although getting developers and dbas to do error management with automatic containment in order to avoid having recover from a disaster can be rather difficult, there are quite a few of us who believe it's better to do error containment so as not to have a disaster to recover from wherever possible - but of course as it's not always possible we still have to plan for disaster revovery and test the disaster recovery process regularly).
Tom
July 5, 2017 at 6:51 pm
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:32 AMSteve Jones - SSC Editor - Monday, July 3, 2017 8:23 AMMighty - Monday, July 3, 2017 1:27 AMTiny comment about the explanation. It is not true that nothing can trigger the job: you can trigger the job manually.That's not a trigger, IMHO. That's a manual start.
we can go on into a copious amount of detail about everything that can start a job, irrespective of the job's own schedule, e.g. another job or a stored procedure or a process on another server, to name but a few.
However, that is not what this question is asking.
This question can (and should) be answered correctly by anyone with some DBA experience.
Agreed. It seemed like a simple one.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply