January 9, 2009 at 2:21 pm
January 9, 2009 at 2:31 pm
It's there... just doesn't look that way because (sorry) ... it's virtual. 😛
Actually, it sounds like a good idea. The boys in ops just virtualized all of our machines. None of the problems we had after that had anything to do with SQL server... it was all on the size of VM and those guys not understanding things like still having the need to allocate for a page file, etc, etc. Drove me nuts and have a decent forum to ask a couple of questions on could have saved me a lot of heart burn... the guys in ops aren't real available to us... they're in another state, as are the VM servers, now. And, they don't really like us so they're pretty tight lipped. They don't think DBA's should even know what a "C" drive is never mind making a performance recommendation as to why to setup MDF's and LDF's on seperate spindles on the SAN.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 11, 2009 at 10:45 am
Good idea, I'll add one somewhere. Despite my desire to have less forums, this makes some sense.
January 12, 2009 at 8:21 am
Thanks Steve, I'll add it to my feed reader in a minute.
Jonathan Kehayias | Principal Consultant | MCM: SQL Server 2008
My Blog | Twitter | MVP Profile
Training | Consulting | Become a SQLskills Insider
Troubleshooting SQL Server: A Guide for Accidental DBAs[/url]
January 12, 2009 at 8:29 am
Feel free to pass it along. I know there are lots of virtualization questions out there.
January 12, 2009 at 8:34 am
Steve,
Google Reader returns "Permission Denied" if you try to subscribe to the RSS Feed on that new forum.
Jonathan Kehayias | Principal Consultant | MCM: SQL Server 2008
My Blog | Twitter | MVP Profile
Training | Consulting | Become a SQLskills Insider
Troubleshooting SQL Server: A Guide for Accidental DBAs[/url]
January 12, 2009 at 9:01 am
Jeff Moden (1/9/2009)
They don't think DBA's should even know what a "C" drive is never mind making a performance recommendation as to why to setup MDF's and LDF's on seperate spindles on the SAN.
What, you mean they should? 😉
I was told by someone someone high up in server support (a technical person) at a large international bank (that shall remain unnamed), that he doubted that any of his DBAs would be able to tell you what RAID level any of their drives had, and that was how it should be as only the storage engineers had the knowledge and training to recommend a RAID level.
That was about a week before he referred to me as a "clueless idiot" in a mail to my manager after I had requested RAID 10, dedicated disks for a mission critical server.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
January 12, 2009 at 10:04 am
GilaMonster (1/12/2009)
That was about a week before he referred to me as a "clueless idiot" in a mail to my manager after I had requested RAID 10, dedicated disks for a mission critical server.
How dare you demonstrate a stronger knowledge of RAID than the "senior experts" in the field? In that case it isn't rocket science.... Just read the Microsoft recommendations in every whitepaper on the subject.
I love it when people prove that they are morons without me even having to help. That guy probably had velcro on top of his shoes since Laces would be excessive work, although they are better suited to the job in the long term.
Jonathan Kehayias | Principal Consultant | MCM: SQL Server 2008
My Blog | Twitter | MVP Profile
Training | Consulting | Become a SQLskills Insider
Troubleshooting SQL Server: A Guide for Accidental DBAs[/url]
January 12, 2009 at 1:28 pm
GilaMonster (1/12/2009)
That was about a week before he referred to me as a "clueless idiot" in a mail to my manager after I had requested RAID 10, dedicated disks for a mission critical server.
BWAAA-HAAA!!!! Ask the nub if he like pork chops! 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply