February 23, 2008 at 6:13 am
Join made between Table A,B,C . based on one column i joined. logically i can join one column only. no issue in join. there is no index.
but Table A & b goes table scan (cost = 0%) , estimated row count 3 lakhs for both, C Table has index scan row count is 4 lak.
if table scan cost is zero mean anything harm ???
Cost should be less for index and table scan ????
February 23, 2008 at 7:45 am
The cost % is the optimiser's estimate of how expensive an operation is relative to the rest of the query. If you have a table scan of a very small table and another operation (index seek or scan) on a very large table, it's quite normal that the table scan comes out with a low percentage.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
February 26, 2008 at 10:06 am
Cost for indexed table is unnecessarily less than table scan if indexes are not created correctly.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply