32 bit or 64 bit

  • How to know if I in 32 bit or 64 bit enviroment.

  • Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    How to know if I in 32 bit or 64 bit enviroment.

    Right click on SQL Instance in SSMS, select properties, the initial properties windows lists the Server information, Product shows the SQL Server Edition and if it is 64 bit, it shows (64-bit)


    Bru Medishetty

    Blog -- LearnSQLWithBru

    Join on Facebook Page Facebook.comLearnSQLWithBru

    Twitter -- BruMedishetty

  • Ask your system admin.

    You can also run this in Query Analyser: select @ @ version (no spaces after the @ signs). If you see x64 in the returned string you are in a 64-bit environment; if you see x86 then it is a 32-bit environment.

  • Bru Medishetty (12/9/2009)


    Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    How to know if I in 32 bit or 64 bit enviroment.

    Right click on SQL Instance in SSMS, select properties, the initial properties windows lists the Server information, Product shows the SQL Server Edition and if it is 64 bit, it shows (64-bit)

    May not work in this case. OP is probably using Enterprise Manager/Query Analyzer based on the forum (SQL Server 7, 2000) that this question is posted. 😉

  • Oops I see it now.

    I am habituated working in SSMS even with SQL 2000 Servers.


    Bru Medishetty

    Blog -- LearnSQLWithBru

    Join on Facebook Page Facebook.comLearnSQLWithBru

    Twitter -- BruMedishetty

  • This is what I get:

    Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2040 (Intel X86) May 13 2005 18:33:17 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2) I don't see 32 or 64

  • Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    This is what I get:

    Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2040 (Intel X86) May 13 2005 18:33:17 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2) I don't see 32 or 64

    Look at what I have emphasised above. Then, reread my previous post.

  • Thank you

  • Lynn Pettis (12/9/2009)


    Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    This is what I get:

    Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2040 (Intel X86) May 13 2005 18:33:17 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2) I don't see 32 or 64

    Look at what I have emphasised above. Then, reread my previous post.

    Don't have time to read previous replies, can you spare some time to reply once more. 😛 😛


    Bru Medishetty

    Blog -- LearnSQLWithBru

    Join on Facebook Page Facebook.comLearnSQLWithBru

    Twitter -- BruMedishetty

  • Bru -

    Note the Intel x86 in the string that Lynn was pointing out.

    You must be having a long day.

    Greg E

  • Greg Edwards-268690 (12/9/2009)


    Bru -

    Note the Intel x86 in the string that Lynn was pointing out.

    You must be having a long day.

    Greg E

    Greg, I did read Lynn's reply earlier, I sent it for fun.. (keeping OP in mind)


    Bru Medishetty

    Blog -- LearnSQLWithBru

    Join on Facebook Page Facebook.comLearnSQLWithBru

    Twitter -- BruMedishetty

  • Bru Medishetty (12/9/2009)


    Lynn Pettis (12/9/2009)


    Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    This is what I get:

    Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2040 (Intel X86) May 13 2005 18:33:17 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2) I don't see 32 or 64

    Look at what I have emphasised above. Then, reread my previous post.

    Don't have time to read previous replies, can you spare some time to reply once more. 😛 😛

    Humour, Greg, Humour. He caught it. Look at the emoticons. 😉

  • Lynn Pettis (12/9/2009)


    Bru Medishetty (12/9/2009)


    Lynn Pettis (12/9/2009)


    Krasavita (12/9/2009)


    This is what I get:

    Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2040 (Intel X86) May 13 2005 18:33:17 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2) I don't see 32 or 64

    Look at what I have emphasised above. Then, reread my previous post.

    Don't have time to read previous replies, can you spare some time to reply once more. 😛 😛

    Humour, Greg, Humour. He caught it. Look at the emoticons. 😉

    Heh... forget the emoticons... look at this avatar. :-):-D:-P;-):hehe:

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Bru Medishetty (12/9/2009)


    Greg Edwards-268690 (12/9/2009)


    Bru -

    Note the Intel x86 in the string that Lynn was pointing out.

    You must be having a long day.

    Greg E

    Greg, I did read Lynn's reply earlier, I sent it for fun.. (keeping OP in mind)

    I must need a vacation really bad.

    I completely missed the pictures to clarify your response.:w00t:

    Greg E

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply