February 20, 2007 at 4:16 pm
We're installing sql on a 2 node cluster.
We are now trying to instal sql 2000 and when we enter the computer name "of a new or existing Virtual sql server to manage" we get "the name you entered already exists on the network". Our Admins had created a virtual server with the name we want to use. Does the sql install create this server?
February 21, 2007 at 12:43 am
this name gets published through the cluster service. So the name will get published at sql-instance-install time.
BOL has more regarding "install a cluster"
Johan
Learn to play, play to learn !
Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:
- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]
- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt
press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀
Need a bit of Powershell? How about this
Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
February 21, 2007 at 5:14 am
Sam, ithink you are entering the Machine name. the name to be entered should be the virtual server name for the windows cluster that you have created already.
February 21, 2007 at 5:51 am
The names should be unique and informative. The computer name for the virtual server name is not correct choice
February 21, 2007 at 7:33 am
As I recall, the installer wants to create the name in either WINS or DNS or both. If someone has already created the name records, the installer will complain.
I remember, a very long time ago, having to go in and remove the names from DNS, and allow the installer to do the DNS updates.
I'm not 100% sure I remember this correctly, but I think this may be your problem.
jg
February 21, 2007 at 11:56 am
Yes, the installer did want to create the entry in the dns. Got it up and running. Thanks for the help.
September 17, 2009 at 9:43 am
Thanks a lot. This worked for me.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply