Slow in Reviewing Scripts
-
You all seem pretty slow in reviewing scripts....
-
I'd rather have slow, steady and accurate then some of the other things I've seen posted on the web elsewhere. Take your time Steve and keep up the good work !
RegardsRudy KomacsarSenior Database Administrator"Ave Caesar! - Morituri te salutamus."
-
Posted a script on July 6th. No review yet.
Yes, I agree that all submissions must be reviewed very carefully, but I still think this is slow. Perhaps the mgmt should recruit some trusted reviewers.
Jeff Roughgarden, Ph.D., MCDBA, MCSD
-
Jeff,
This is not a pay per response site, it is mostly peers offering the odd snippet of experience to help out others. If you truly require immediate response, why not log a ticket with MS.
-
I did not ask a question.
I submitted a script on July 6th and have heard nothing in over two weeks.
This is slow response to me. It is a disincentive for me to submit any additional scripts.
-
Jeff,
I apologize, I misinterpreted your post.
-
No problem.
-
Apologies for that. It's kind of a low priority item. Actually I should remove it and just let people vote on scripts.
-
Steve, please do not stop reviewing things. It's one of the most positive attributes of this site - I know when I get a script from SSC it's OK. I do not have to take the time to review it in detail. Ask for volunteers possibly to assist. Send them the script and ask for results. Maybe of you had a small number of 'volunteers' thst would help as well. I'd certainly can afford to devote a bit of time to a worthy task such as that. I'm sure that there are other community members that can do so as well.
RegardsRudy KomacsarSenior Database Administrator"Ave Caesar! - Morituri te salutamus."
-
I agree that scripts should be reviewed. Please ask for volunteers and have the scripts reviewed by 3 peers, then make your judgment. It's the way they do it in academia.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply