October 19, 2018 at 3:04 pm
I have a very paranoid Skype4B engineer on my current project. We were planning on using Sql Server 2016 and DAG for the database solution of the Skype installation. He seems to believe that there are problems and issues with it. But I cannot seem to find information to that effect. Should I be paying this more attention or am I on safe ground with this solution. The only issue I see could possibly be band width, but the customer says it will be taken care of.
thanks
Bill
October 22, 2018 at 6:41 am
wreiman 78397 - Friday, October 19, 2018 3:04 PMI have a very paranoid Skype4B engineer on my current project. We were planning on using Sql Server 2016 and DAG for the database solution of the Skype installation. He seems to believe that there are problems and issues with it. But I cannot seem to find information to that effect. Should I be paying this more attention or am I on safe ground with this solution. The only issue I see could possibly be band width, but the customer says it will be taken care of.thanks
Bill
If your engineer can't point to anything specific, with references, then I would be sceptical.
However...
Skype for business does have its own distributed functionality - perhaps it would be better to use that with local AGs? That's what I've done in the past - a pair of SQL Servers in each DC set up to run as an Availability Group, then use S4B to do its own cross-site stuff.
There are a couple of caveats with S4B & AGs, though. I'm sure I made a note of them somewhere...
Thomas Rushton
blog: https://thelonedba.wordpress.com
October 22, 2018 at 10:33 am
Thanks... its been a bit hard to find information. Maybe we could go thru the normal SKYPE4B setup with WSFC and AD and then add it in later?
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply