August 14, 2009 at 2:46 am
Hi,
We have SQL2000 default instances, and would like to upgrade to SQL2008.
The green zone is at the weekends, and we would like to avoid working on Sat / Sun. 🙂
So I'm thinking about a solutoin, which requires the less effort in the green zone.
-We could go with the in-place upgrade - but testing everything etc could be done in the greenzone only
-We could install a Named SQL2008 instance, set up / test everything, and in the green zone I'd need to only restoring the DB, which is relatively fast. But at the end I'll have a named instance instead of default, and maybe it can cause problems later.
My question is:
-Can I have a SQL2000 and SQL2008 default instances (with different ports, of course) in the same time on a box?
-What are the drawbacks of using SQL2008 named instance as a default instance? (is it possible? .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 ASP applicatoins are the main clients)
-Any other idea how to solve this situation?
Thank you!
August 14, 2009 at 8:30 am
Attila (8/14/2009)
My question is:-Can I have a SQL2000 and SQL2008 default instances (with different ports, of course) in the same time on a box?
-What are the drawbacks of using SQL2008 named instance as a default instance? (is it possible? .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 ASP applicatoins are the main clients)
-Any other idea how to solve this situation?
1, no
2. none really. It's the client that has to know to connect. Note that if you do this, I'd set up a standard port for the instance in Config manager, don't let the server assign it on startup.
3. Set up a 2nd server, install, test, switch the IPs/names in the green zone (after restore). If you have similar sized servers, round robin over a number of weekends (servera -> new server, serverb ->servera, etc)
August 14, 2009 at 9:25 am
Thanks.
Unfortunately we don't have a "spare" server to do a "round robin"..:-(
What if the client doesn't know the instance name, just connects to the correct oprt? Can it cause problems?
Thank you again.
August 23, 2009 at 11:43 pm
If they know the port then instance name should not be important. However I believe this to be a generally bad practice and limits the ability to change the port if needed. There aren't a lot of reasons (there are some though) to make the actual port known.
CEWII
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply