May 28, 2016 at 5:06 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Mentors and Professional Groups
Best wishes,
Phil Factor
May 30, 2016 at 8:07 am
Face to face is extremely effective because the communication is verbal and visual and a true dialogue.
Written communication gives the opportunity to think before acting but requires a great deal of skill in order to transmit exactly what was intended.
With a geographically dispersed workforce, face to face is constrained to video tech which is better than nothing. If you've had to use it when it works it works and when it doesn't it is immensely frustrating. One of the frustrations is that companies try and do it on the cheap. Fuzzy microphones and tinny speakers undermine the whole experience. Trying to mentor and guide over such a setup makes it hard to pick up on vital cues from the recipient.
May 30, 2016 at 3:38 pm
From the Article:
It didn’t always go smoothly, I’ll admit. Frank Whittle, the inventor of the turbojet engine, presented the idea at a meeting of his professional association, only to be told in the subsequent discussion that the idea could never work. Brunel was told by the eminent Dionysius Lardner at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science that it was completely impossible for a steam liner to travel across the Atlantic.
[font="Arial Black"]ESSAYONS![/font]
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply