March 23, 2014 at 12:40 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item OPENQUERY-2
March 23, 2014 at 10:58 pm
Interesting question, thanks Carlo.
---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
March 24, 2014 at 1:14 am
Nice follow-up question, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
March 24, 2014 at 2:05 am
Koen Verbeeck (3/24/2014)
Nice follow-up question, thanks.
+1, Thanks for sharing
March 24, 2014 at 2:26 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
March 24, 2014 at 2:36 am
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (3/24/2014)
Interesting question, thanks Carlothought the lack of a semi-colon between deleted.* and COMMIT would cause an error.
Goes to show...
The lack of a semi-colon causes or would cause an error?
March 24, 2014 at 3:08 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
March 24, 2014 at 12:43 pm
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (3/24/2014)
Carlo Romagnano (3/24/2014)
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (3/24/2014)
Interesting question, thanks Carlothought the lack of a semi-colon between deleted.* and COMMIT would cause an error.
Goes to show...
The lack of a semi-colon causes or would cause an error?
As stated, I thought it would cause an error, but it did not.
Oh, I thought you said "though", though you said "thought."
As far as I know, the only times when SQL Server requires a ; between statements is when there's a statement before a "WITH" CTE expression (to differentiate from the possible "WITH" clause for some statements) or at the end of a "MERGE" statement.
March 25, 2014 at 12:59 am
You made it easy by making 'Commit' in bold and capital letters, but anyway thanks Carlo for the good 2 openquery questions.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
March 26, 2014 at 1:46 am
Interesting one, thank you for post, Carlo.
ww; Raghu
--
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.
March 26, 2014 at 6:11 pm
I had trouble getting my head around the "OPENQUERY-1" question a few days back, but found this question a little easier thanks to the research and discussion of that one.
... I notice, though, that similar to the first "OPENQUERY" QOD question, the answer '-1' gets 3% of the total answers for this QOD.
What I'm having trouble getting my head around now is - has anyone figured out what a return of -1 rows is going to look like? 😛
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply